Talk:Kuala Lumpur International Airport: Difference between revisions
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Palembang is in fact the new service == |
== Palembang is in fact the new service == |
||
It is stated in the airasia website, check it out. (on the right side of the frame)... |
It is stated in the airasia website, check it out. (on the right side of the frame)... [[User:Marcusaffleck|Marcusaffleck]] 08:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Aeroflot Services == |
== Aeroflot Services == |
||
Revision as of 08:43, 17 October 2006
Names
I've removed the ridiculous slew of names from the beginning of the article. Only the Malay name is official, and it's already listed in the infobox. Jpatokal 07:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- (Malay: Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Kuala Lumpur) (Chinese: 吉隆坡国际机场) (Tamil:கோலாலம்பூர் அனைத்துலக விமானநிலையம்) (Japanese:クアラルンプール国際空港) (Arabic: please fill in )
All those names that we placed in is to enable foreign people who don't know how to read Malay and it has no harm to the article!Place it back again.
Even the signs in KLIA are multilangual. It doesn't hurt to put the name of the airport in the languages particularly the languages shown in the signs at KLIA. Zack2007 13:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, it does hurt, because it makes the first sentence completely unreadable. You can stick 'em in the infobox if you insist. Jpatokal 04:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
How does it hurt you? A knife pierce trough ur eyeball?? Jus leave it alone!
Even the world best airports do also put their foreign names on the article,why not KLIA?
Palembang is in fact the new service
It is stated in the airasia website, check it out. (on the right side of the frame)... Marcusaffleck 08:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Aeroflot Services
Since Aeroflot is going to resume it's flight,Aeroflot will be removed from Previous Users Section to avoid conflict.Futhermore,all additional airlines are based on the informations adopted from their respective webpages and are correct Marcusaffleck 08:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)