User talk:Justlettersandnumbers/old4

  User page     Talk page     Older talk     Sandbox     Toolbox     References     Articles created     CSD log  

How can i speak with you?

I'm not ignore you i want to be agree Master Studio (talk) 14:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Master Studio, if you want to talk about the Barozzi family, the place to do it is Talk:Barozzi family. Otherwise, I will see anything you write at User talk:Master Studio. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Untitled

Hi, I'm working on the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe page and I'm not sure why the content is being reverted to an outdated version. Yesterday, I added relevant footnotes and references and it has been reverted again. Please let me know how to proceed. Thank you. CIRad84 (talk) 08:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

CIRad84, may I suggest that you read about (a) conflict of interest, (b) promotional editing and (c) independent reliable sources, which were my reasons for reverting your edits. I've replied here, but the place to discuss that article is the talk-page, Talk:Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Fénix Awards

Hi, Justlettersandnumbers, I've just edited "Fénix Awards" in order to rescue the page, maintaining part of your original information. I make the commitment to keep it updated. Following the Wikipedia advice, I'm letting you know this change, hoping that you won't mind and help me to improve the content of this page. Thank you. --Lunaliu (talk) 13:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

I don't think that's "my" information, Lunaliu, it's just what was left after I removed a copyright violation there. Anyway, we don't move pages by copying the content to a new page, so for now I've redirected Fénix Awards to Draft:Fénix Awards, which has the previous history of the page. May I suggest that you work on it there and submit it for review when you think it is ready? Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

I wrote you because I thought, erroneously, that you were the creator of the page. My mistake. Anyway, neither do I copy the content of a page from another page. The information contained in Draft:Fénix Awards is all mine, as it's seen in the History of the page. It was I who put it in there and in Fénix Awards at the same time, because I thought that replacing the old draft was a previous requirement to make a new publication. In any case, the Draft:Fénix Awards is the one to repair, delete or reverse, not the other one. The work in Fénix Awards is new and original, not a copy-paste, (only from my sandbox, where it's still remaining), and has not a copyright violation. I'm not a relative with this stuff, only a fan who asked for some kind of help. It's for sure that the article may suffer from many issues but, as some user wrote: "it needs revision from a movie-spectacle expert". Sadly, again this article was "lost in translation", multiple mistakes, technicalities, and other obstacles that are placing it to a limbo, doing a small favor to casual readers, movie lovers, or general culture. The cry for help is still on the air for someone who has the faculties and the interest to serve and honor what should be the raison d'être of Wikipedia: accurate, reliable and verified information.--Lunaliu (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Revert

Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I saw you reverted my edit on Lombard Street (Baltimore). I placed the article in Category:Guardia Lombardi because, as it says in the article, the street is named after the town of Guardia Lombardi. I think this makes the article relevant to that category. Do you not agree? Ergo Sum 01:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, certainly I had missed that rather surprising statement, Ergo Sum, so I may have been wrong there (though I don't think so). The talk-page of that article would be the best place to discuss it, I think. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Tamarin Prover

Hi Justlettersandnumbers,

I see you've removed a bunch of my edits to the Tamarin Prover article. I'm really disappointed this is the case, as while I've used Tamarin, I'm not an author of the Tamarin tool, nor have I made any code-contributions to the tool. It is not part of my job to maintain, edit, or write code or documentation for the tool. I have written one academic paper that happens to use the tool (which is cited), but nothing further -- I am a Tamarin user or practitioner, who finds the tool very useful, and my aim is to create a wikipedia page for other people who might also find it useful. My PhD supervisor (Cas Cremers) is one of the listed authors, but as you can see from the list of members of the team I'm not a member of the project. I'm happy for you to remove his edits as there is perhaps a COI there, but I do not believe there is in my case.

You really didn't need to remove the Applications section and all the linked examples of Tamarin's use -- I had added citations for literally every single bullet point, many of which are papers by people with no connection to Tamarin at all, nor any connection to any of the authors of Tamarin (further adding to the notability requirements). How can I establish notability if you just remove any edits I make?

This is really frustrating and saddening to me, as I have spent a lot of time working on this, and you've just removed otherwise completely sensible and defensible (and fully cited!) content for no apparent reason. If you take issue with any of the content (or if any of it isn't cited properly), please feel free to delete it based upon its specific merits. Otherwise, please at least give me a chance to build the basis of a working article for this before deciding whether or not to delete content from it.

Will you be happy to edit the article to include requested or suggested content? If not, please don't remove otherwise completely defensible content. If you are happy to take some level of responsibility for making this in to an excellent article, then I would be thrilled -- but in that case, please check the content you have removed for factual accuracy, and re-add it back in.

All best wishes, Mpdehnel (talk) 13:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Further addition:

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.

I am a PhD student at the University of Oxford, and I state this affiliation openly on my user page. I am a) not employed (as I am a PhD student, not an employee) and b) I do not nor will I ever receive any compensation for editing this or any other page. My status as a PhD student gives me a good understanding and knowledge of the project, but it is not remotely part of my PhD (or any semblance of 'job' or similar) to edit this page. I therefore do not believe I have a conflict of interest with this page. As described before, I am a user or practitioner of Tamarin, not an editor, maintainer, developer, or anything else. Please let me know (given the above information) which of the COI guidelines I have violated, given I clearly state my affiliation on my user page.

Requests that are not supported by </nowiki>independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Every single thing I added in that you removed was fully cited.

Mpdehnel (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

citation needed on page of Services Preparatory Institue

Dear Sir,

Will this citation work for Services Selection Boards?

http://spiaurangabad.com/AboutSPI.aspx

Thank you very much.

Atulbamne (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2018 (UTC)