Talk:AAR: Difference between revisions
TonyBallioni (talk | contribs) →Requested move 7 January 2018: relist |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* '''Weak oppose'''. I see no reason for this, and no virtue to it. Per DABNAME, ''"The title of a disambiguation page is the ambiguous term itself, provided there is no primary topic for that term. If there is a primary topic, then the tag "(disambiguation)" is added to the name of the disambiguation page,"'' In which case the ambiguous term remains at [[AAR]], as there is no obvious primary topic. I'd also keep it at [[AAR]], not [[Aar]], as most do seem to be acronyms. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 11:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC) |
* '''Weak oppose'''. I see no reason for this, and no virtue to it. Per DABNAME, ''"The title of a disambiguation page is the ambiguous term itself, provided there is no primary topic for that term. If there is a primary topic, then the tag "(disambiguation)" is added to the name of the disambiguation page,"'' In which case the ambiguous term remains at [[AAR]], as there is no obvious primary topic. I'd also keep it at [[AAR]], not [[Aar]], as most do seem to be acronyms. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 11:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' This unnecessary move with no benefit. The (disambiguation) classifier is only added when there's already primary topic that occupied the name, otherwise it is needless even useless, because readers don't have any issue with (disambiguation), they don't type it. When you type AAR in the search box you'll land directly on the DAB page. But if there's already Primary topic AAR and dab page AAR, then AAR with (disambiguation) classifier can be warranted. –[[User:Ammarpad|Ammarpad]] ([[User talk:Ammarpad|talk]]) 18:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:37, 21 January 2018
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Clearing links to this disambiguation page
Links to this page from the main article space have been redirected to more appropriate targets. Courtland 02:22, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Dead link
Link next to "At any rate" does not work. I cannot find any article containing SMS abbreviations. Kipu44 (talk) 11:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 7 January 2018
It has been proposed in this section that AAR be renamed and moved to Aar (disambiguation). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
AAR → Aar (disambiguation) – Per WP:DABNAME. feminist (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. I see no reason for this, and no virtue to it. Per DABNAME, "The title of a disambiguation page is the ambiguous term itself, provided there is no primary topic for that term. If there is a primary topic, then the tag "(disambiguation)" is added to the name of the disambiguation page," In which case the ambiguous term remains at AAR, as there is no obvious primary topic. I'd also keep it at AAR, not Aar, as most do seem to be acronyms. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose This unnecessary move with no benefit. The (disambiguation) classifier is only added when there's already primary topic that occupied the name, otherwise it is needless even useless, because readers don't have any issue with (disambiguation), they don't type it. When you type AAR in the search box you'll land directly on the DAB page. But if there's already Primary topic AAR and dab page AAR, then AAR with (disambiguation) classifier can be warranted. –Ammarpad (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)