Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Estrin: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''Delete''' I could not located anything beyond trivial coverage in third party sources. [[User:Billhpike|Billhpike]] ([[User talk:Billhpike|talk]]) 20:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' I could not located anything beyond trivial coverage in third party sources. [[User:Billhpike|Billhpike]] ([[User talk:Billhpike|talk]]) 20:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. I don't see how [[WP:PROMO]] applies. There is nothing promotional whatsoever about the article either in its current state or at any stage in its history. As for [[WP:Notability]], accoding to IMDB, he has writing credits in some very notable series including [[Boston Public]], [[Touched by an Angel]], and [[The Practice]] and for a Disney animated movie (though a minor one, [[Pocahontas 2]]). This one is near the margin, but with the additional producer and director credits and the authorship of a volume in the The Hollywood Professionals series, this person is sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. [[User:TimBuck2|TimBuck2]] ([[User talk:TimBuck2|talk]]) 21:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. I don't see how [[WP:PROMO]] applies. There is nothing promotional whatsoever about the article either in its current state or at any stage in its history. As for [[WP:Notability]], accoding to IMDB, he has writing credits in some very notable series including [[Boston Public]], [[Touched by an Angel]], and [[The Practice]] and for a Disney animated movie (though a minor one, [[Pocahontas 2]]). This one is near the margin, but with the additional producer and director credits and the authorship of a volume in the The Hollywood Professionals series, this person is sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. [[User:TimBuck2|TimBuck2]] ([[User talk:TimBuck2|talk]]) 21:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - none of the references are independent, authoritative references. Even if the subject wrote for some notable series, nothing indicates that the subject meets [[WP:ANYBIO]] criteria.--[[User:Rpclod|Rpclod]] ([[User talk:Rpclod|talk]]) 01:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:55, 26 January 2018
- Allen Estrin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:Notability WP:PROMO Jamesharrison2014 (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 25. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I could not located anything beyond trivial coverage in third party sources. Billhpike (talk) 20:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see how WP:PROMO applies. There is nothing promotional whatsoever about the article either in its current state or at any stage in its history. As for WP:Notability, accoding to IMDB, he has writing credits in some very notable series including Boston Public, Touched by an Angel, and The Practice and for a Disney animated movie (though a minor one, Pocahontas 2). This one is near the margin, but with the additional producer and director credits and the authorship of a volume in the The Hollywood Professionals series, this person is sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. TimBuck2 (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - none of the references are independent, authoritative references. Even if the subject wrote for some notable series, nothing indicates that the subject meets WP:ANYBIO criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)