Talk:List of cognitive biases: Difference between revisions
→Preference falsification: new section |
Undid self |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
: Site's not dead, just moved without leaving a redirect. [[User:Paradoctor|Paradoctor]] ([[User talk:Paradoctor|talk]]) 14:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
: Site's not dead, just moved without leaving a redirect. [[User:Paradoctor|Paradoctor]] ([[User talk:Paradoctor|talk]]) 14:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
== [[Preference falsification]] == |
|||
...seems like a form of cognitive bias; should it be added to the list? —[[Special:Contributions/2606:A000:4C0C:E200:5816:CC2:4ADE:73A0|2606:A000:4C0C:E200:5816:CC2:4ADE:73A0]] ([[User talk:2606:A000:4C0C:E200:5816:CC2:4ADE:73A0|talk]]) 22:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:29, 28 January 2018
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of cognitive biases article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Extraordinarity bias was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 December 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of cognitive biases. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Learned Helplessness
I feel like Learned Helplessness should be somewhere on this list, but I don't know enough about the subject to be comfortable adding it. Tristyn⌘ 18:17, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- A cognitive bias may be involved in the phenomenon, but learned helplessness itself is not a cognitive bias. Actually, it is rational not to expend effort that can reasonably be expected to be wasted. Paradoctor (talk) 22:53, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Anthropocentrism
@Gaia Abundance Life: This is a list class article. Notice how each point only includes a very short summary with a link to the relevant article. I suggest adding your material to Anthropocentrism instead and to only add a single sentence here if necessary. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 19:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
List Length Effect Link Suggestion
Currently the List Length Effect entry of the list has a note for Further Explanation Needed. It seems like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_recall is related to List Length Effect. Since List Length Effect doesn't redirect to another larger entry I suggest that List Length Effect should be linked to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_recall until a complete article on List Length Effect is made.
Siphayne (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of cognitive biases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090117084058/http://www.usc.edu/projects/matherlab/pdfs/Matheretal2000.pdf to http://www.usc.edu/projects/matherlab/pdfs/Matheretal2000.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Site's not dead, just moved without leaving a redirect. Paradoctor (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- List-Class psychology articles
- High-importance psychology articles
- Psychology articles needing attention
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- List-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- List-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- List-Class logic articles
- Mid-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Philosophy articles needing attention