Neglected firm effect: Difference between revisions
m Tagging using AWB (10703) |
not an orphaned page |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{unreferenced|date=January 2010}} |
{{unreferenced|date=January 2010}} |
||
{{refimprove|date=January 2010}} |
{{refimprove|date=January 2010}} |
||
{{orphan|date=February 2010}} |
|||
{{original research|date=January 2010}} |
{{original research|date=January 2010}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 23:54, 4 February 2018
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The Neglected firm effect is the phenomenon of lesser-known firms producing abnormally high returns on their stocks. The companies that are followed by fewer analysts will earn higher returns on average than companies that are followed by many analysts. The abnormally high return exhibited by neglected firms may be due to the lower liquidity or higher risks associated with the stock.
According to Investopedia: "Neglected firms are usually the small firms that analysts tend to ignore. Information available on these companies tends to be limited to those items that are required by law, on the other hand, have a higher profile, which provides large amounts of high quality information (in addition to legally required forms) to institutional investors such as pension or mutual fund companies."