Jump to content

User talk:TheKinkdomMan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 72: Line 72:


Seeming how my phone won’t allow me to cite it I conclude with your edit to Mary, I’ll let it be someone else’s problem [[User:TheKinkdomMan|TheKinkdomMan]] ([[User talk:TheKinkdomMan#top|talk]]) 20:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC) [[User:TheKinkdomMan|TheKinkdomMan]] ([[User talk:TheKinkdomMan#top|talk]]) 20:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Seeming how my phone won’t allow me to cite it I conclude with your edit to Mary, I’ll let it be someone else’s problem [[User:TheKinkdomMan|TheKinkdomMan]] ([[User talk:TheKinkdomMan#top|talk]]) 20:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC) [[User:TheKinkdomMan|TheKinkdomMan]] ([[User talk:TheKinkdomMan#top|talk]]) 20:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

:Great. Do notify me when you are able to cite it if you would like to continue this discussion. Thanks! [[User:DantODB|DantODB]] ([[User talk:DantODB|talk]]) 20:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:39, 5 February 2018

TheKinkdomMan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi TheKinkdomMan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paige (wrestler). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested a page protection no one has done anything about it and I know the rules further more I shouldn't be the one singled out when I'm trying to do the right thing TheKinkdomMan (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've already protected the page. And a belief that you are doing the right thing does not exempt you from edit warring. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting a protection on the page TheKinkdomMan (talk) 01:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 01:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No your right it doesn't exempt me I admit I was in the wrong and I'm glad you pointed it out to me I apologize for my edit war and wrong doing TheKinkdomMan (talk) 01:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 01:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Cole

This edit had you remove the word "and" from the sentence "signed to WWE and assigned to their developmental territory NXT". Explain to me how in the fuck that sentence works without "and" there. Or actually don't. Judging by the incoherent garbage you scribbled onto my talk page, grammar and punctuation aren't your strong suit. Him being signed to WWE is sourced elsewhere in the article so a source isn't needed for that in the lead. Note that his championship wins are also left unsourced in the lead. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk) 09:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep talking like this to me and I'll saying something else to a administrator I don't care who you are or how long you've been on here you know the rules so stop breaking them this is your warning before I report your ass got it TheKinkdomMan (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one I put their in the sentence and you reverted it many times so this one is on you and don't leave rude messages on my wall TheKinkdomMan (talk) 14:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 14:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atypical

Hi! I see you undid my revisions to Atypical, but you did not include an edit summary explaining why. What did you think was wrong, or against WP:PLOT?

Thanks, karatalk 13:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. DantODB (talk) 19:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that this user is using Instagram and diva dirt as a source which Instagram isn’t a source it’s a social media page and further more diva dirt hasn’t been proven reliable and thirdly this user never tried to discuss this they just kept reverting my edits when I’m pointing out to them that the source isn’t reliable TheKinkdomMan (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All sources should be used with discernment, and Diva-Dirt, however unproven as reliable, has not been proven unreliable either. Seeing that the article cited is written by Kanellis herself, stating her own name as Mary Louis Kanellis, I don't understand why any more discussion is to be had. Plus, you keep mentioning "reliable sources" mentioning her first name is Maria. Where are these reliable sources, and should they have more weight than the subject of the article stating her own name? DantODB (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s a reliable source IMDB is one and isntgram is definitely not reliable diva dirt isn’t written by her it’s written by the people who created the page that has been proven and further more her birth records also prove her birth name is Maria not Mary TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t wanna get blocked and I’m assuming neither do you so let’s have a discussion about Maria instead of waiting on Administration, does that sound fair TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say IMDB is a reliable source? Also, where are these birth records? Please enlighten me of these by providing citations leading to them. Thanks. DantODB (talk) 20:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the birth record data base and you can find it IMDB is a international data base witch provides reliable sources I didn’t have a chance to cite her birth record database on her page however if Wikipedia doesn’t allow me to cite it then I can’t but just so you know Instagram isn’t a reliable source just like twitter isn’t as we speak I’m trying to cite the birth record data base TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On her external links her IMDB page is listed TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, if you looked at the Diva Dirt article, you would see that Kanellis herself wrote it. Also, I'm familiar with IMDB, and I don't see anywhere on her IMDB page (which you never cited, but here it is: [1]) that her name is Maria Louis Kanellis. I only see Maria Kanellis, which is her common name, not necessarily her legal name. I understand Instagram isn't a reliable source, but it is a post by Kanellis herself of the degree she attained, so I used it with discretion. DantODB (talk) 20:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok let’s agree to disagree I am unable to cite it at this moment because of my phone but we’ve discussed it and I apologize for reverting your edits I look forward to continuing editing and seeing your edits if you wanna go to the review board and state that we’ve came up with a conclusion that’s fine or I can do it TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what is there to agree or disagree about when all of the citations state the information I stand by, whereas the belief of her first name being Maria is unsourced at best. Also, what is your conclusion, if I may ask? DantODB (talk) 20:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seeming how my phone won’t allow me to cite it I conclude with your edit to Mary, I’ll let it be someone else’s problem TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Do notify me when you are able to cite it if you would like to continue this discussion. Thanks! DantODB (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]