Talk:Soyuz 33: Difference between revisions
m Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::Thanks[[User:Graham1973|Graham1973]] ([[User talk:Graham1973|talk]]) 16:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
::Thanks[[User:Graham1973|Graham1973]] ([[User talk:Graham1973|talk]]) 16:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Confusing description of re-entry burn?== |
|||
How can it be that in one paragraph the burn is described as too long and in the following paragraph as too short? Granted, delta-v can be in any direction, but when we say "greater delta-v, steeper fall" we do introduce a number of assumptions that should not be immediately and silently dropped.[[User:Spamhog|Spamhog]] ([[User talk:Spamhog|talk]]) 20:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:56, 5 February 2018
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soyuz 33 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Spaceflight Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Russia Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Film or Book Version of Marooned?
I've recently obtained a copy of James Oberg's Red Star in Orbit which describes the aftermath of the failed docking with Salyut 6 as follows:
Since the inoperative maneuvering engine was also used for returning to Earth, the Soyuz-33 crewmen were in genuine danger of being trapped in space until their air ran out in a few days. In fact, the commander (a veteran of the Apollo-Soyuz project named Rukavishnikov, who spoke fluent English) later admitted to thinking briefly about an American science fiction novel he had once read - Marooned by Martin Caidin - which was about space-station astronauts trapped in orbit by a faulty rocket engine.
James Oberg. Red Star in Orbit. Harrap (1981), pg 196. ISBN 0245538097
It would appear that there is a discrepancy between this account and the one used to prepare the article. It might be worth further investigation. Graham1973 (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'll double-check my sources to see what they say and we can ammend accordingly. If both, we could say both. Canada Jack (talk) 14:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds like a planGraham1973 (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I fixed the reference - indeed, it was the book, not the film, that Ruk. had thought of, at least according to Newkirk (and Oberg). Good catch. Canada Jack (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- ThanksGraham1973 (talk) 16:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Confusing description of re-entry burn?
How can it be that in one paragraph the burn is described as too long and in the following paragraph as too short? Granted, delta-v can be in any direction, but when we say "greater delta-v, steeper fall" we do introduce a number of assumptions that should not be immediately and silently dropped.Spamhog (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)