Jump to content

Talk:Restorative neurology: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 2: Line 2:


{{WPMED|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WPMED|class=Stub|importance=Low}}

== Peer Review for LIB 150 ==

Not enough information is provided as to what it is that restorative neurology (RS) is as much as there is an explanation of what RN does.
The spelling is okay, but not so much the grammar. Although the writing is objective and encyclopedic, it is difficult to understand. The sentences sound too listy, as though they are run-ons, and are too abstract in their writing.

Revision as of 02:24, 8 February 2018

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sophia8004, Sarah.hasel, Gamarroquin (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Khadijashafiq.

WikiProject iconMedicine Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peer Review for LIB 150

Not enough information is provided as to what it is that restorative neurology (RS) is as much as there is an explanation of what RN does. The spelling is okay, but not so much the grammar. Although the writing is objective and encyclopedic, it is difficult to understand. The sentences sound too listy, as though they are run-ons, and are too abstract in their writing.