Talk:FreeRTOS: Difference between revisions
WikiProject tagging/assessment |
downgraded from C- to Start-class |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Free Software |class= |
{{WikiProject Free Software |class=Start |importance=High |software-importance=Mid |computing-importance=Low}} |
||
==".org" should be removed from the name== |
==".org" should be removed from the name== |
Revision as of 21:50, 8 February 2018
Software: Computing Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
".org" should be removed from the name
I think the ".org" should be removed from the name "FreeRTOS.org". The name of the operating system is FreeRTOS, the internet domain is FreeRTOS.org. Look at their website [1] to see that they call it "FreeRTOS" themself. 86.84.145.232 12:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Is there any SSL port for Free RTOS
Hi
I would like to know that is there any SSL port available for FreeRTOS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.147.22 (talk) 06:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I think that maybe you should try asking the FreeRTOS team, rather than the internet in general, and wikipedians specifically. Jimadilo (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Coldfire Support
So... it says "Supported OSes" and lists Coldfire. But beside Coldfire is a parenthesized "not supported". So, which is it? Is it no longer supported? Was it ever supported? -Fuzzy (talk) 20:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
"Assembler Functions"
The language is called "assembly". The program which translates it to binary is an "assembler". 24.1.252.60 (talk) 11:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
OpenRTOS
Do we really need a complete sales pitch for this operating system? According to the SafeRTOS website itself:
"However, SAFERTOS is not FreeRTOS. It has been completely redesigned by our team of safety experts. Our engineers took the FreeRTOS functional model..."
This should be moved to it's own page, which is linked to from the FreeRTOS page, and the very obvious bias should be corrected . I may do some of this myself if I find the time. Jimadilo (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Modified GPL to allow commercial use
GPL donesn't forbid commercial use, so this sentence should be rephrased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.150.224.69 (talk) 10:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on FreeRTOS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120704013911/http://www.ece.stevens-tech.edu/~ymeng/publications/IROS08_SMARbot_meng.pdf to http://www.ece.stevens-tech.edu/~ymeng/publications/IROS08_SMARbot_meng.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141028062044/http://www.openrtos.com/openrtos/ to http://www.openrtos.com/openrtos/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141028062044/http://www.openrtos.com/openrtos/ to http://www.openrtos.com/openrtos/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)