Jump to content

Talk:Data curation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lwarres (talk | contribs)
Minor grammar edit: new section
Update Implementing Digital Curation assignment details
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Computational Biology|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Computational Biology|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Maryland/Implementing_Digital_Curation_(Spring_2018) | assignments = [[User:Lwarres|Lwarres]] }}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Maryland/Implementing_Digital_Curation_(Spring_2018) | assignments = [[User:Jenny 1990|Jenny 1990]], [[User:Lwarres|Lwarres]] }}


This topic (Data Curation) should probably be merged with the topic on "Digital Curation".
This topic (Data Curation) should probably be merged with the topic on "Digital Curation".

Revision as of 10:30, 1 March 2018

Template:WikiProject Computational Biology This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jenny 1990, Lwarres (article contribs).

This topic (Data Curation) should probably be merged with the topic on "Digital Curation". They seem to be the same thing.

  • I disagree. There's no curational aspect to data wrangling, which is all about using data that happens to be in an inconvenient format. Data curation is about preserving for the future. Curation may make future munging easier (or less necessary) but that not it's primary goal, per se. People who do data curation almost of necessity must wrangle with data formats, but people who wrangle with data need not be concerned with its curation. There are a lot of web apps out that that screen scrape data or repurpose it in unexpected ways but I hardly think their authors are too concerned with long-term preservation. It's the difference between maintenance and application. Phette23 (talk) 06:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Something is amiss here. I also disagree that data wrangling and data curation should be merged into one topic. So I agree with the above two posters, and disagree with the statement that appears on the main article page. However, just above, it says that this article on data curation should be merged with an article in library science titled "Digital Curation". That does make sense to me. I think this is best kept in the area of library science. Can the note on the main page be altered to match the note at the top of this talk page? Or do we have to wait longer for others to respond to the suggestion regarding data wrangling? MarkGoldfain (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Data curation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minor grammar edit

I reworded the opening sentence of the Definitions and Practice section to improve grammar. Lwarres (talk) 20:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]