Talk:Hartman Personality Profile: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:30, 1 March 2018

Psychology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science

A section on the origin of the theory would be good. For instance, was it found to more completely account for variance in the questionnaire? What is the empirical basis for the questionnaire? Jim Bowery (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrght

This looks like it was pulled straight from the book, isn't that a copyright violation? 128.187.0.178 (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. Do we know for sure that it wasn't authorized by the copyright holder? Chiralgia (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Four temperaments

What is the difference between the four temperaments and the four personality types in the Hartman Personality Profile? They seem to correspond:

Red: The Power Wielders = Powerful Choleric
Blue: The Do-gooders = Perfect Melancholy
White: The Peacekeepers = Peaceful Phlegmatic
Yellow: The Fun Lovers = Popular Sanguine

Chiralgia (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like wikipedia, but this article highlights all of its weaknesses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.227.7.138 (talk) 02:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LDS mention

In the article there's a mention of the LDS (Latter-day Saint) church. but no mention of how this relates or why this church in particular factors into this discussion. I don't know the history of test or researcher, but does this imply that Dr. Hartman was a Mormon? Is the test common among the Mormon church? As a Mormon myself, I've seen it used for fun in a few situations, but never seriously or as a church-sanctioned activity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.75.188.130 (talk) 03:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment may be confused with the Hartman Value Profile (HVP)

Something on this page needs to address the fact that this report is not the same as the HVP report that is derived from the work of Robert S. Hartman. Their are some people that accidentally call or refer to the HVP as the Hartman Personality Profile and it is not even close to this one. In addition, I was directed to this page from the information on the DISC Assessment and some notation from that page should also potentially send people to the HVP page, as it is also used along side the DISC report by many.

Luludesbois (talk) 09:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC) I agree with this comment. Hartman Value Profile (HVP) is made from the work of Robert S. Hartman (deceased), while the Hartman Personality Profile (HPP), also called the Color Code, originates from Dr. Taylor Hartman's (still alive) book "The Color Code". The HVP has nothing to do with colors, while the HPP is based on 4 colors describing personality types.[reply]

For those reasons I don't understand (the article being about the Dr. Taylor Hartman's HPP) why there is a reference to the Hartman Institute (www.hartmaninstitute.org) wich is about Robert S. Hartman and not Dr. Taylor Hartman...

See : https://www.hartmaninstitute.org Robert S. Hartman's HVP and https://taylorhartman.com/ for the Dr. Taylor Hartman's HPP Luludesbois (talk) 09:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject Psychology |class=Start |importance=Low}}
 == Science ==
 A section on the origin of the theory would be good.  For instance, was it found to more completely account for variance in the questionnaire?  What is the empirical basis for the questionnaire? [[User:Jabowery|Jim Bowery]] ([[User talk:Jabowery|talk]]) 15:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)