Jump to content

Talk:Search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mh370-captio.net
Line 173: Line 173:
==http://mh370-captio.net/ ==
==http://mh370-captio.net/ ==
Has this source promoted by [[User:Kasos fr]] been used in the article, discussed, removed? Is it reliable? It shows a trajectory ending near [[Christmas Island]]... [[User:WikiHannibal|WikiHannibal]] ([[User talk:WikiHannibal|talk]]) 13:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Has this source promoted by [[User:Kasos fr]] been used in the article, discussed, removed? Is it reliable? It shows a trajectory ending near [[Christmas Island]]... [[User:WikiHannibal|WikiHannibal]] ([[User talk:WikiHannibal|talk]]) 13:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
:This source result from a study made by French aeronatics specialists from [[Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France]] with Engineers from [[Inmarsat]], who made a conference on the subject in Cannes in October 2017 : [http://aaafctedazur.blogspot.fr/2017/09/le-detournement-du-vol-mh370.html Le Détournement du vol MH370]. Il is described in the French Wikipedia version. As they say in their web site CAPTIO : it's a Plausible version.--[[User:Kasos fr|Friendly, Kasos_fr]] ([[User talk:Kasos fr|talk]]) 14:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:59, 2 March 2018

Unreferenced material

When the article was split from Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the editor who performed the split appears to have removed references from this content that resulted in an error (ie. there was a named reference in the copied text, but the full reference remained in the original article, causing a bold error message in the "References" section). This some of this text unreferenced. I've added references to content in the "Satellite communications and radar" and "International involvement" sections of this article, which were left mostly unreferenced (the latter had no inline citations). However, other sections of this article, from before the October 2014 split, may contain content where the appropriate reference was removed.

I'm just leaving a note behind for future editors of this article who come across unreferenced material in this article to please check the version of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 just prior to the split to see if it did have a reference. The "edit" link doesn't appear next to section headers in the old version of the article, so you will need to click the "edit" tab at the top of the page, find the reference, copy and paste it to the appropriate location in this article. Many references are just named references, with the full citation in the "References" section of that article. For example, you may find <ref name=EXAMPLE> or <ref name="EXAMPLE NAME"> in the prose, while the full citation is in the references section. Just add the named reference to this article and save, then check the "References" section of this article to see if an error ("Cite error: The named reference EXAMPLE was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." in big, bold, red letters) is present. If so, the easy fix is to 1) copy the name of the reference, 2) go back to old revision of the MH370 article (in edit view), and 3) use your browser's search/find function (in most browsers, Control+F) to find the full citation and copy it to the end of the "References" section in this article, before the final two brackets }}. If you need any help, just leave a message here or on my talk page. AHeneen (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed content

Inaccurate content

The following content has been removed because it is not accurate. While the references are reliable and it appears that the reports were accurate, these vessels never joined the search for some reason.

  • Also contracted for the Malaysian government's effort, Boustead Heavy Industries and iXBlue Australia will supply a remotely operated vehicle that can be used to identify any positive leads detected by the towed sonar vehicles, which will be deployed aboard the MV John Lethbridge.[1][2]
  • Malaysia will contribute four vessels to the effort, including the naval survey ship KD Mutiara and naval vessel Bunga Mas,[3] and the GO Phoenix.

--AHeneen (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assets

@AHeneen: I assume the following list of assets was removed just because it was long, not inaccurate? If so, they'd make a great stand-alone list: List of assets involved in the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Your thoughts? Fgnievinski (talk) 23:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Surface search assets (17 March – 28 April)

Between 17 March and 28 April, military aircraft from eight countries carried out 345 search sorties, for a total of over 2,998 hours of flight time. Aircraft involved in the visual search included:[45]

refer to caption
Chinese PLAAF Ilyushin Il-76 arriving at RAAF Base Pearce in Perth, Australia on 21 March 2014.

Ships:[45]

Refs

  1. ^ Sandilands, Ben (6 July 2014). "Malaysia announces MH370 search contract awards". Crikey. Retrieved 8 October 2014.
  2. ^ "Hisham: GO Phoenix vessel to join MH370 search operations". Maylay Mail Online. 18 September 2014. Retrieved 8 October 2014.
  3. ^ "Contractor Announced for MH370 Underwater Search". JACC. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  4. ^ "Australia sending two P3C Orions from Darwin to Malaysia to aid with the search for missing Malaysian flight MH370". News Corp Australia. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  5. ^ http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2014/mar/15/bangladesh-begins-malaysian-plane-search
  6. ^ "Bangladesh joins Malaysian plane search". Dhaka Tribune. 15 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  7. ^ Zhu Ningzhu (10 March 2014). "Brunei's Suldan [sic] sends message of sympathy to Chinese president over loss of flight MH370". Xinhua News Agency. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  8. ^ "China dispatches more vessels for plane search". Xinhua News Agency. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
  9. ^ "Chinese warships on way to rescue mission". Xinhua News Agency. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  10. ^ "China deploys satellites for missing plane search". Xinhua News Agency. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
  11. ^ a b Missing Malaysian jet: Search reaches Chennai coast in Bay of Bengal Times of India 14 March 2012
  12. ^ "Malaysia Airlines MH370: India deploys 4 warships in search ops". Livemint. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
  13. ^ "India to deploy helicopters, ships in Malaysian jet search". Reuters. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
  14. ^ "India joins global search to locate missing Malaysia Airlines plane". The Indian Express. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
  15. ^ a b c Gupta, Jayanta. "Indian Navy joins search". The Times of India. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
  16. ^ Indian Navy joins the search for missing Malaysian plane IBN Live 13 March 2014
  17. ^ Bagus BT Saragih (9 March 2014). "RI deploy warships as search expands to Malacca Strait". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
  18. ^ Fadli (9 March 2014). "RI deploys warships, aircraft to SCS to search for missing aircraft". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  19. ^ "MH370 SAR ops: Japan Joins Search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370". The Diplomat. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  20. ^ a b "Too early to come to any conclusion, says Najib". Daily Express. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  21. ^ "Vietnam, Malaysia mount search for plane". Sky News Australia. 8 March 2014.
  22. ^ "Malaysia widens area of search for missing MAS aircraft". Borneo Post. Bernama. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  23. ^ "Missing MAS flight: Malaysia grateful for assistance in search and rescue operations, says Anifah". The Star. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  24. ^ Michael Field (11 March 2014). "NZ air force joins search for missing jet". stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
  25. ^ "Malaysian plane crashed off Vietnam coast: state media". Yahoo News. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  26. ^ "PH joins SE Asia search for Malaysian plane". Rappler. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  27. ^ "Malaysia Airlines: How is the search being carried out". BBC News. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
  28. ^ "PH planes ships still have no sighting of missing malaysian jet". Philippine Daily Inquirer. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  29. ^ "Phl Navy's helicopter joins search for missing Malaysian Airlines plane". The Philippine Star. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
  30. ^ "Malaysia Airlines missing flight: Live Report". Yahoo! News Malaysia. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  31. ^ "Malaysian Airlines missing flight MH370: Live Report". Digital Journal. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  32. ^ "Additional SAF assets deployed in response to missing Malaysia Airlines Plane (09 Mar 14)". Ministry of Defence of Singapore. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  33. ^ Leong, Wai Kit (14 March 2014). S'pore deploys another patrol aircraft for MH370 search". Channel NewsAsia
  34. ^ "MISSING MH370: South Korea sends two aircraft to help with SAR". New Straits Times. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
  35. ^ "Taiwan joins search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370". Taiwan Today. 11 March 2014. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  36. ^ "Search for missing Malaysian jet involves 8 countries". The Nation. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2014.
  37. ^ "Thai navy ready to deploy rescue vessels, aircraft for missing Malaysian plane: spokesman". CCTV News. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  38. ^ "MISSING MH370: Rescue efforts under way". New Straits Times. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  39. ^ "US P-3 and USS Pinckney helicopter over Malaysian Airlines search site". U.S. Seventh Fleet Public Affairs. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  40. ^ "U.S. Sends Destroyer to Aid Search for Malaysia Airlines Jet". NBC News. 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  41. ^ "US Navy sending P-8A Poseidon to assist in search for missing flight MH370". The Malaysian Insider. 13 March 2014.
  42. ^ Cite error: The named reference ntsb was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  43. ^ "RSAF sends plane to search for missing Malaysia Airlines aircraft". Channel NewsAsia. 8 March 2014.
  44. ^ "No piece of metal found 60km from Vung Tau". Bubblews.
  45. ^ a b "Search for MH370: Facts and statistics --Surface search of the southern Indian Ocean" (PDF). Joint Agency Coordination Centre. Retrieved 31 October 2014.

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Interim report-March 2015":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 00:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed AHeneen (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Debris search on the east coast of Africa

Shouldn't a the possible debris section be a debris search section for the search in the zone off the coast of eastern Africa? -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 11:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't found any formal search zone off Réunion. They are beach combing, of course. kencf0618 (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It can be changed if a significant search effort is made around Réunion. However, most media report that the search in the area is just beach combing. AHeneen (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Underwater locator beacons

If the plane went down in the first week of March, knowing the battery life of the underwater locator beacons, why did it take so long to mount a search. Was this a case of gross incompetence? There is nothing in the article to explain that failure. We learn that there was possible detection in the first 2 weeks of April when the batteries were at the end of there useful life???? It seems to have been a very indolent and bungled effort from the start. Given that the locator beacons were crucial to finding the wreckage, and they needed to rapidly determine the best area to search, there should have been some sense of urgency. What happened? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.165.210 (talk) 03:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reports section/list

I have added a "Reports" section plus duplicated those reports listed in the parent Flight 370 article which relate to the search operation, as I felt this information was highly relevant to this article. If there is a better way to do this, or if others disagree, pls advise.
❮❮ GEEKSTREET Talk Lane ❯❯ 05:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why no 2017 updates, info, etc.?

Am curious as to why there are no updates for 2017.

At "The Week" website (www.the week.co.uk), there have been three articles posted so far this year --- January 3, January 6, and January 10 --- of which the last one talks about one of the main search vessels going rapidly to a new search area.

Might want to check this out and see if the info there can be used to update this entry. 68.231.71.119 (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image sizes

Right now, my user preference is "400px", and I like to keep it that way. If the size scale is changed, this would affect visual execution for those using "220px" and not signed-in at the moment. However, using the "400px" option, the images would be very big and may affect the readership, especially when the text is pushed so much. The images might need some shrinking. --George Ho (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly 'located'?

"Explosive new report virtually pinpoints location of missing flight MH370" here www.news.com.au AUGUST 16, 2017 @ 4:08PM.

"The Australian Transport Safety Bureau has today released an explosive new report that effectively narrows the search zone for the missing plane down to an area half the size of Melbourne. The report places the most likely location of the aircraft “with unprecedented precision and certainty” at 35.6°S, 92.8°E — in between Western Australia and Madagascar."

Just FYI. 220 of Borg 06:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Search for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Has this source promoted by User:Kasos fr been used in the article, discussed, removed? Is it reliable? It shows a trajectory ending near Christmas Island... WikiHannibal (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This source result from a study made by French aeronatics specialists from Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France with Engineers from Inmarsat, who made a conference on the subject in Cannes in October 2017 : Le Détournement du vol MH370. Il is described in the French Wikipedia version. As they say in their web site CAPTIO : it's a Plausible version.--Friendly, Kasos_fr (talk) 14:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]