User talk:Ripapart: Difference between revisions
Warning: Three-revert rule on Veerapandiya Kattabomman. (TW) |
→March 2018: Don't communicate through templates |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 12:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 12:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
==March 2018== |
|||
Hi, Ripapart. Communicating with an experienced editor wholly through a clutch of templates, as you did on [[User talk:Sitush]], merely shows your own inexperience. The templates are primarily intended for new editors — though you shouldn't post such a lot of templates on ''any'' editor. As for Sitush's templated warning about edit warring above, that is a formality that's necessary for an admin to be able to sanction you for edit warring (in case that becomes necessary). You own nonsensical collection of warnings to Sitush to "assume good faith", stop "disruptive editing", etc serves no such purpose. Don't post on Sitush's page again (or anybody's page, for that matter) unless you're able and willing to talk in your own words, without a flock of templates. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 12:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC). |
|||
Revision as of 12:26, 3 March 2018
Marriedwiki.com as a source
Hi Ripapart . I noticed that you used marriedwiki.com as a source for information in a biography article, Sarayu Rao . I cannot find any evidence or discussion that demonstrates marriedwiki.com meets reliable sourcing criteria, let alone the high standards required for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
Your recent editing history at Veerapandiya Kattabomman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
Hi, Ripapart. Communicating with an experienced editor wholly through a clutch of templates, as you did on User talk:Sitush, merely shows your own inexperience. The templates are primarily intended for new editors — though you shouldn't post such a lot of templates on any editor. As for Sitush's templated warning about edit warring above, that is a formality that's necessary for an admin to be able to sanction you for edit warring (in case that becomes necessary). You own nonsensical collection of warnings to Sitush to "assume good faith", stop "disruptive editing", etc serves no such purpose. Don't post on Sitush's page again (or anybody's page, for that matter) unless you're able and willing to talk in your own words, without a flock of templates. Bishonen | talk 12:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC).