Jump to content

Talk:Burundi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Burundi/Archive 1) (bot
Line 49: Line 49:
|archive = Talk:Burundi/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Burundi/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

== Health Section ==

I moved this section previously located under Health to Economy.

"Burundi is a landlocked, resource-poor country with an underdeveloped manufacturing sector. The economy is predominantly agricultural; agriculture accounts for just over 30% of GDP and employs more than 90% of the population. Burundi's primary exports are coffee and tea, which account for 90% of foreign exchange earnings, though exports are a relatively small share of GDP. Burundi's export earnings – and its ability to pay for imports – rests primarily on weather conditions and international coffee and tea prices."

[[User:Hifear267|Hifear267]] ([[User talk:Hifear267|talk]]) 16:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)




Shouldn't there be more information on the 2015/16 crisis? It is relevant and an important issue in Burundi overall.

Also, Isn't the percent of Muslim people in Burundi more than 3%?
- Martine N (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2016 [[User:Martine N|Martine N]] ([[User talk:Martine N|talk]]) 19:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

== Religion ==

Isn't the percent of Muslim people in Burundi more than 3%?

[[User:Martine N|Martine N]] ([[User talk:Martine N|talk]]) 19:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


== History ==
== History ==

Revision as of 00:01, 5 March 2018

Former good articleBurundi was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 26, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
August 4, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
October 11, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 19, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 1, 2011.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of March 28, 2005.
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage Template:Vital article

History

Shouldn't there be more information on the 2015/16 crisis? It is relevant and an important issue in Burundi overall.

Martine N (talk) 19:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

colony of Belgium?

The main body of the article gives nuances that would not be in the introductory paragraph; but still, is it correct to simply say Burundi was a Belgian colony? I think it is misleading. Perhaps this sentence: "Both Germans and Belgians ruled Burundi and Rwanda as a European colony known as Ruanda-Urundi" could be changed to "Germans ruled Burundi as a colony until it was joined to Rwanda as a Mandate of the League of Nations entrusted to Belgium, which treated it as a colony until independence in 1962." I would also say the whole lede is far too long, with much material that should be moved to the body of the article.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Burundi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Burundi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English as Official Language

I've noticed a lot of reverts with the language section. Just to clarify, English is an official language.[1][2][3][4] In addition, I've noticed that some have claimed that the draft law has not come into effect. This is not true.[5] Please do not revert the language edit. If, for whatever reason, you still contest whether English is an official language, please discuss it here. Hesnotblack (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]