Talk:Deloitte: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2014; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:17, 6 March 2018

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business: Accounting Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The edge

this building is missing http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-09-23/see-the-world-s-greenest-office-building-the-edge I think it is notable enough for wikipedia on its own, bt certainly for inclusion in notable Deloitte buildings section here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.244.74.165 (talk) 13:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism EDD

The whole section is a bit much and reminds me of those complaint sites, but the EDD about a one time delayed payment falls under not notable one time events. There are alternative outlets outside of Wikipedia to air grievances.--WatchingContent (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The whole thing looks like a giant scarlet letter. Superkatlover (talk) 21:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure what an "EDD" is in this context, but there's nothing in the article anymore about a delayed payment. The remaining cases in this section seem to be notable and should be kept. Zazpot (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deloitte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160125185555/http://www.thecourt.ca/2016/01/19/livent-v-deloitte-has-the-fat-lady-finally-sung/ to http://www.thecourt.ca/2016/01/19/livent-v-deloitte-has-the-fat-lady-finally-sung/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry-picking negative information

I am in the process of vetting the "Controversy" section and have discovered that large amounts of the information and negative sources have been cherry-picked to make Deloitte look bad. I am adding a warning tag, as this is going to take a long time to clean up. Superkatlover (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No drive by tagging please. If you think you can improve the section then please do so rather than leaving it to others. Dormskirk (talk) 23:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually working very hard to correct the bias by removing bad sources and finding good ones. It is slow going as I am not experienced at this. Superkatlover (talk) 07:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"large amounts of the information and negative sources have been cherry-picked to make Deloitte look bad" - that's quite a brazen assertion. Please remember to assume good faith. Zazpot (talk) 12:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with GovLab

not notable enough for a separate article DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. Dormskirk (talk) 23:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:07, 6 March 2018 edit DGG (talk \| contribs) 316,874 edits Proposing to merge GovLab into Deloitte (TW) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:17, 6 March 2018 edit undo Dormskirk (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 410,943 edits →Proposed merge with GovLab: reply Next edit →
Line 43:		Line 43:

	not notable enough for a separate article '''[[User:DGG\| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG\| talk ]]) 23:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)		not notable enough for a separate article '''[[User:DGG\| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG\| talk ]]) 23:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
			:'''Support''' merge. [[User:Dormskirk\|Dormskirk]] ([[User talk:Dormskirk\|talk]]) 23:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)