User talk:Ukpong1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:09, 7 March 2018

AfC notification: Draft:Moses Ukpong has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Moses Ukpong. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 04:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons. Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/70\|Women's History Month 2018]] Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00\|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your allegation of sockpuppetry and conflict of interest NickHill

I would like to invite you back to your posting on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#NickHill and look forward to your response. Whilst I truly appreciate your efforts to maintain high standards on Wikipedia, I would also invite you to reflect whether the actions are even handed, or may be considered heavy handed. Since if actions aren't carefully calibrated, they may have negative effects overall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Hill (talk • contribs) 17:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't occur to me at first, but as I re-read your allegation, you talk about BitcoinZ as though it is a web site. I can assure you that BitcoinZ is no more a web site than Ethereum, or Bitcoin are web sites. (they may have web sites about them, but they aren't in and of themselves web sites). I invite you to look at the draft, and instate that as a main article. The draft closely follows the editorial profile of other crypto currencies, which have no flags. If you would like more information, please let me know. Nick Hill (talk) 02:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 I would like to invite you back to your posting on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#NickHill and look forward to your response.
 Whilst I truly appreciate your efforts to maintain high standards on Wikipedia, I would also invite you to reflect whether the actions are even handed, or may be considered heavy handed. Since if actions aren't carefully calibrated, they may have negative effects overall.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nick Hill|Nick Hill]] ([[User talk:Nick Hill#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nick Hill|contribs]]) 17:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+::It didn't occur to me at first, but as I re-read your allegation, you talk about BitcoinZ as though it is a web site. I can assure you that BitcoinZ is no more a web site than Ethereum, or Bitcoin are web sites. (they may have web sites about them, but they aren't in and of themselves web sites). I invite you to look at the draft, and instate that as a main article. The draft closely follows the editorial profile of other crypto currencies, which have no flags. If you would like more information, please let me know. [[User:Nick Hill|Nick Hill]] ([[User talk:Nick Hill|talk]]) 02:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)