Talk:514107 Kaʻepaokaʻawela: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Rfassbind moved page Talk:2015 BZ509 to Talk:(514107) 2015 BZ509: new numberings per MPC batch 2 Mar 2018 |
stub→start, c/e |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Astronomy|object=yes|class=start|importance=low}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Solar System|Jupiter=yes|class=start|importance=low}} |
||
==Diagrams need editing== |
==Diagrams need editing== |
||
{{ping|Nwbeeson}} Please see the edit I have just done. These diagrams are for a rotating frame of reference, which means Jupiter stays almost stationary over on the right. So I don't think the diagrams should show the orbit of Jupiter as a circle or a line segment. [[User:Eric Kvaalen|Eric Kvaalen]] ([[User talk:Eric Kvaalen|talk]]) 19:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC) |
{{ping|Nwbeeson}} Please see the edit I have just done. These diagrams are for a rotating frame of reference, which means Jupiter stays almost stationary over on the right. So I don't think the diagrams should show the orbit of Jupiter as a circle or a line segment. [[User:Eric Kvaalen|Eric Kvaalen]] ([[User talk:Eric Kvaalen|talk]]) 19:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:50, 7 March 2018
Astronomy: Astronomical objects Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Astronomy: Solar System Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Diagrams need editing
@Nwbeeson: Please see the edit I have just done. These diagrams are for a rotating frame of reference, which means Jupiter stays almost stationary over on the right. So I don't think the diagrams should show the orbit of Jupiter as a circle or a line segment. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 19:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Eric Kvaalen:Yes, that is wonderful. I did not pay enough attention to the fact that the original data is in the rotating frame with Jupiter stationary. I have edited, the originals to put Jupiter in its place. Thanks for the help, it is a demonstration of the power of Wikipedians working together to get it right. Nick Beeson (talk) 20:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Nwbeeson: Great, thanks a lot! Eric Kvaalen (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Unassessed Astronomy articles
- Unknown-importance Astronomy articles
- Unassessed Astronomy articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Solar System articles
- Unknown-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force