Jump to content

User talk:Hitmanagement2016: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 110: Line 110:


[[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 10:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
[[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 10:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

== [[Line 3 (Hangzhou Metro)]] - moved to [[Draft:Line 3 (Hangzhou Metro)]] ==



Hi Hitmanagement2016, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of [[Line 3 (Hangzhou Metro)]] has been moved to [[Draft:Line 3 (Hangzhou Metro)]]. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the [[WP:BURDEN]] which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as [[facebook]], [[twitter]], [[instagram]], [[imbd]] and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as [[The Guardian]], [[Sydney Morning Herald]], [[CNN]] news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, [[Random House]] or [[Cambridge University Press]]). Pls see

# reliable source - see [[WP:RS]]
# primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see [[WP:WPNOTRS]]
# verification - see [[WP:V]]
# notability - see [[WP:N]]
# webcite - see [[WP:CITEWEB]] and its template -see [[Template: cite web]]

Once you have provided inline citations, you could move back the page to "article" to resubmit. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at [[WP:TEAHOUSE|the Teahouse]]. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit [[WP:The Wikipedia Adventure]] for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. [[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 06:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:48, 8 March 2018

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Hitmanagement2016! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:18, Tuesday, January 17, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Hitmanagement2016! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:18, Tuesday, January 17, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Hitmanagement2016! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:31, Tuesday, January 17, 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 06:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Hitmanagement2016! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 06:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 07:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 23:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 07:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hangzhou West Railway Station

Hello Hitmanagement2016,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hangzhou West Railway Station for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hitmanagement2016, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Line 3 (Hangzhou Metro) has been moved to Draft:Line 3 (Hangzhou Metro). Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

  1. reliable source - see WP:RS
  2. primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
  3. verification - see WP:V
  4. notability - see WP:N
  5. webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, you could move back the page to "article" to resubmit. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]