Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helena Ekblom (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources AFD|Helena Ekblom}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Helena Ekblom}})
Fails [[WP:NBIO]] and [[WP:GNG]], as there are no sources proving notability on the article. There are no Ghits that prove notoriety either. [[User:Kirbanzo|Kirbanzo]] ([[User talk:Kirbanzo|talk]]) 19:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Fails [[WP:NBIO]] and [[WP:GNG]], as there are no sources proving notability on the article. There are no Ghits that prove notoriety either. [[User:Kirbanzo|Kirbanzo]] ([[User talk:Kirbanzo|talk]]) 19:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
::'''Keep'''. She is very well known as the perhaps most famous of Women preachers in contemporary 19th-century Sweden and in no way obscure in this context but the perhaps most known. I don't understand what makes her non-notable. The article has several references. This article has already been questioned in a deletion discussion, and the result was to keep. --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram|talk]]) 19:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
::'''Keep'''. She is very well known as the perhaps most famous of Women preachers in contemporary 19th-century Sweden and in no way obscure in this context. I don't understand what makes her non-notable. The article has several references. This article has already been questioned in a deletion discussion, and the result was to keep. --[[User:Aciram|Aciram]] ([[User talk:Aciram|talk]]) 19:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:42, 9 March 2018

Helena Ekblom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG, as there are no sources proving notability on the article. There are no Ghits that prove notoriety either. Kirbanzo (talk) 19:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She is very well known as the perhaps most famous of Women preachers in contemporary 19th-century Sweden and in no way obscure in this context. I don't understand what makes her non-notable. The article has several references. This article has already been questioned in a deletion discussion, and the result was to keep. --Aciram (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]