User talk:PRehse

Your tag

Hi. To tell the truth, I don’t understand the reason for your tagging the article. I’ve already furnished the article with several WP:reliable sources including DigiGuide and Michelle Yeoh Web Theatre. The references added by me provide evidence for the fact that Prapimporn Karnchanda has had significant roles in a number of films (WP:ENT #1). Is this new revision good enough? --Janggun Dungan (talk) 19:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

List of martial arts

Hi, i am trying to add content to the list of martial arts article, some of the martial arts do not have articles written about them i.e. Puños Continuos which is a military combat system developed for the Cuban military forces. Is this an issue when adding content? Let me know Sincerely AC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.217.32 (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

It is a problem - by long standing consensus and general policy in Lists you need to have an article created.PRehse (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

"Puños Continous" has an article written in spanish within wikipedia, for some reason I can't figure out how to link it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.221.92 (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

It is a problem - by long standing consensus and general policy in Lists you need to have an article created.PRehse (talk) 21:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Brazil has a combat system developed for the military called "Uru-Can"

Catch as Catch Wrestling should be added to United States section, it is under "catch wrestling".

Peru has a martial art developed for the streets called Bakom, sometimes called Vacon.

Recently in the United States Judokickbox was founded by cuban-americans living in Miami.

Poland section should be added and have Polish school of sabre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.221.92 (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

You recently deleted Dog Brothers Martial Arts and 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu from "list of martial arts" article after claiming incorrectly that they do not have an article created and that they are not martial arts, please be more careful next time you delete an entry in an article or you will be reported for vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.216.165 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

(by talk reader) "...you will be reported." To whom? I can tell you right now that your IP can be blocked and you will be powerless to stop it. PRehse hasn't deleted anything, but go ahead and issue meaningless threats. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Chris troutman, my message was not a threat it was a statement, PRehse incorrectly deleted 2 entries in the "list of martial arts" article which were Dog Brothers Martial Arts and 10th planet Jiu-Jitsu by erroneously claiming that the 2 entries were neither martial arts or had articles written about them, if you do some searching you will find that both entries qualify. "Martial Arts" such as DBMA and 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu were created by people, and are managed by "people" that formed "organizations" in order to "organize" instruction, competition, requirements, testing, certification, ranking, etc.

I.E. Kajukembo was created by people and is managed by an "organization"...

As for reporting "to whom?" If you or PRehse continue to erroneously erase entries after being politely proven wrong and asked not to delete such entries, then a "report of vandalism" shall be filed with a wikipedia administrator and then that administrator shall decide what to do next. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.216.165 (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Isaac Chamberlain

Not sure why you have added the notability tag twice now. If you feel it's not notable, take it to AfD, instead of repeatedly inserting the tag. That is the procedure when notability tags are challenged. HampsteadLord (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

HampsteadLord Well the idea is you should not remove maintenance tags without addressing the issue. As it stands it's a prime candidate for deletion but I don't believe new articles should be rushed to AfD.PRehse (talk) 21:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Notability has already been established by the presence of multiple sources providing significant coverage, and going back years. I believe it is better to nominate for deletion rather than repeatedly tagging. Since you believe in waiting, I take it you will nominate in a few days or so. HampsteadLord (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

HampsteadLord Eventually I might. I usually like to give articles a couple of weeks before AfD.PRehse (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

I eagerly look forward to that course of action. HampsteadLord (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

About Fix-It Felix Jr.

Fix-It Felix Jr., was originally intended to be only from the movie, but in reality, that is left behind, it actually exists, but it started as the Wreck-It Ralph promotion. Just people like you, deny the presence of the game in real life and not admit a related article, because you haven't seen or played it, I have played. It deserves to be, like the other games from the other movies.

Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8sssti_mCY&t=75s — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ofihombre (talk • contribs) 12:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

I defend this article, because I have proof of it, and in the words of Jules Verne: "Everything that man imagines becomes a reality" and video games aren't the exception. Fix-It Felix Jr. must be in the Post-fictional category, Because it has been seen hundreds of times by many people who hadn't imagined that this game really existed.

Belated best wishes for a happy 2018

^{The Fox Hunt (1893) by Winslow Homer, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts.}
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.

BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

BoringHistoryGuy

Cheers.PRehse (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Caesalpinia mimosoides

I don't think I reviewed this. I definitely didn't intend to. The log suggests you reviewed it, perhaps unintentionally when tweaking the talk page? Anyway, not a big problem. The article was turned into a redirect to a cut'n'pasted copy, reverted, done again, and now I'm trying to start discussion. Don't know how well it will all go down, but fingers crossed. Lithopsian (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Lithopsian Best not to have two articles on the same topic.PRehse (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Redirect Ninja

		Redirect Ninja
		Thanks for helping out during the NPP New Year Backlog Drive by reviewing redirects. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, PRehse. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Biographies of filmmakers

Hello! Just a reminder that {{WikiProject Film}} does not cover biography articles, such as actors, directors and filmmakers. This applies to all of the film task forces as well, which means that the American cinema task force does not include articles about American actors, directors and filmmakers, and consequently should not have the |film=yes parameter on the {{WikiProject United States}} banner. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 17:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State ownership, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enterprise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

editing posts

There are edits being made to a page by experts on the topic and you have repeatedly deleted the new and corrected content. Can you please advise as to how I can ensure that the content updates will not be undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.152.32.254 (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Capitalization

Hello please corrected, the name (Regency) should use capital letters, I want to move it but can not, can you move it to Banggai Regency Thank you. OktaRama2010 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

OktaRama2010 Sure. For future reference just use the Move tab at the top right of the page although you might have to delete the target first.PRehse (talk) 14:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

QAI revert

Hi - I didn't see a comment from you saying why you reverted my change on the QAI redirect. Could I get some idea of why the edit wasn't acceptable? Thanks. Faught (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)Faught, you changed the redirect to a disambiguation page. You added two entries, one to where the redirect points to, the other with no links at all. A DAB page is just a navigation tool. If an entry does not link to an existing Wikipedia article that has something about the title in it, then it doesn't belong. So in this case the second entry should have been deleted, leaving one entry. Since there is only one entry the page should redirect to that article. ~ GB fan 17:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, exactly.PRehse (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying. I know I've seen entries on longer disambiguation pages that aren't linked anywhere. But perhaps in this case you'd be looking for at least two entries with links to justify having the disambiguation page? I had considered adding a page for the other QAI, but I didn't think I could demonstrate notability for it. Faught (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

If there are DAB pages that have entries that do not link to an article, those entries should be removed. Every entry on a DAB page must be linked to an article. ~ GB fan 19:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Copy-paste moves

Please don't restore copy-paste moves, as you did in this edit. It looks like you thought you were fixing it, but a look at the history should show that you reverted the fix. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello PRehse, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

cheetah

Hi. I did indeed try to move Tanzanian cheetah, i.e. what you called the old page, to East African cheetah. But since there is a redirect in the latter, it was not possible to *move* content of this article. If you think it is not appropriate to cut and paste content from one to the other, then please tell me how to do this alternatively. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 11:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

BhagyaMani You need to first delete the target redirect and then use the Move tab at the top right of the page. I started the process. Please edit the article so that the naming is more consistent with the title.PRehse (talk) 12:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for speedy action!! Sure, will replace name asap. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

O please, can you perform a similar action on Sudan cheetah so that moving content to Northeast African cheetah will be possible ?? This because the name Northeast African cheetah is more appropriate as this spp. occurs not only in Sudan. But latter currently also shows a redirect. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

BhagyaMani Done but I remember some pretty contentious argument about Lion sub species and hope this is less controversial.PRehse (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

So you followed the discussions there. Hope you enjoyed! Well, in the case of cheetah, the no. of accepted subspecies has been reduced to a far lesser extent than the lion ones, viz from 5 to 4. So I do not expect any controversy. Cheerio, -- BhagyaMani (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

I cant really see the difference in that sense with Tanzanian cheetah, since that species occurs in other countries than Tanzania. I guess those two ases are very comparable. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Nice work with reviewing redirects — Zawl 13:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Congregation of the Holy Spirit

Hi, regarding the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congregation of the Holy Spirit, regardless if one article is copied from another, within Wikipedia I think theres still a copyvio problem, and tools lab Earwigs copyvio detector comes up with 94,7% probabilty, which made me think this has to be overlooked. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 500 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 02:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

		Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears
		For maintaining a streak of at least 100 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the asymmetric epicyclic gears. Well done! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 02:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Nicolas Saboly

I see you rated this article "Start": Some content but most readers would need more. See WP:ARTASS. It would be helpful if you could provide advice on the article's talk page (not here) on what would be needed to bring it up to "C": Still major gaps, but useful to a casual reader. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 22:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Aymatth2 open to a C.PRehse (talk) 23:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Copy/paste moves

Howdy! I don't want to add to your already prodigious workload, but I wonder if, when reverting a copy/paste move over a redirect (as at Kailash Chandra Meghwal), it would be a good idea to drop a link to WP:RFPM into the edit summary. If I was sufficiently non-technical to try a copy/paste move (let alone repeatedly), I don't think I would have a clue where to turn when merely told "do a proper move instead" :). Cheers! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Please check your automated and/or script-assisted edits

With this edit you introduced errors into the page - specifically the automated/script-assisted edit used the page titles of domain reselling pages rather than the titles of the actual sources. In this case I fixed them by finding archived copies of the sources at the Internet Archive, but you should have done this (if archived copies are not available, remove the incorrect title and mark them as a permanent dead link). Remember that you are responsible for automated and script-assisted edits you make and other editors should not have to clean up after you. I have not looked at any other edits you've made to see if they need cleaning up as well. Thryduulf (talk) 22:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Sam Zurick

Thanks, for the notification, but I am not the article creator - @Diptanshu Das: is? Either way I think this needs discussing at AFD. GiantSnowman 15:15, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

The Excursion Train

Good evening. Thank you for the improvements. Could you please explain the conceptuality of "bare reference", though? I see you have deployed a template/format which begins with "cite web" so should I always use this for online references and supply the additional publisher, date of publication and access date variables in every case?

Also, sorry, but I really don't understand "jaure at Soft Touch". What does that mean?

Thank you again. Alex. LXV (talk) 21:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

LXVBare references were filled with the linkrot tool - sometimes imperfectly but the idea is not to have jus a web link for the reference.PRehse (talk) 22:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I agree it looks a lot better and potentially more information if all variables used. It's useful so I'll adopt it. Thank you very much for your help. Alex. LXV (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for cleanup

Thank you for your work on List of aluminium smelters. 2.89.216.45 (talk) 18:41, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

AIX1 artist biography

Dear PRehse,

I was wondering if you could help me out with the Artist biography of: AIX1 And i was also wondering if you could help me with the biography of Recordlabel: Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam Wiki Link AIX1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIX1 Wiki Link Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhadir_Recordings_Amsterdam

These pages are not for commercial purpose endings but for independence for both the artist and the record label

Thanks for your Time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akesc (talk • contribs) 20:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Bakheet

Hi there, I don't want to revert your edit without checking with you first. The page contains many different transliterations of exactly the same surname, and all the templates are there to show the versions that are included. What's the rationale for removing all the templates and leaving just the one? Dr. Vogel (talk) 13:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Mohammad Bagher Sharif Tabatabayi

Hello PRehse. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Mohammad Bagher Sharif Tabatabayi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: R3 inapplicable for page moves unless page also recently created; there's also community consensus to keep Draft->Mainspace redirects. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Olimpia Râmnicu Sărat -> CSM Râmnicu Sărat

Can you help me to move page Olimpia Râmnicu Sărat to CSM Râmnicu Sărat? CSM Râmnicu Sărat is an old name of the club, but in the summer of 2017 the club returned to the old name and logo.

Hotărârea Comitetului de Urgență din 24 august 2017 (Emergency Committee Decision of 24 August 2017). frf.ro - Romanian Football Federation announce on its site.

CSM Râmnicu Sărat profile. frfotbal.ro - another confirmation of the change on Romanian Football Federation competitions and schedule site.

Facebook of the team - changed from Olimpia to CSM, also the logo is again the old one, white-blue with the CSM trademark

Twitter - same changes confirmed.

I proposed this change some time ago on the talk page and someone opposed, without any real reason and the move was canceled.

I would be grateful if you could help me. :) Rhinen

Hi Let me introduce myself. I am Felix and I’m a novice in Wikipedia ! I wrote an article recently, it’s a biography of a french-american journalist : Laura Haim. Now, I’m waiting for validation from wikipedian reviewer. Would you be able to help me? I have no idea how long it could take… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Laura_Haim Many thanks for your help. Best

Felix