Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Game: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Snatch Game: oppose deletion |
Ad Orientem (talk | contribs) Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} |
||
:{{la|Snatch Game}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Game|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March |
:{{la|Snatch Game}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snatch Game|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March 17#{{anchorencode:Snatch Game}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Snatch_Game Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|Snatch Game}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Snatch Game}}) |
||
The segment is not sufficiently notable outside of the main show to need its own article. [[WP:FANCRUFT]]. '''--[[User:Woodensuperman|<span style="background:red; color:yellow; padding:2px;">wooden</span>]][[User talk:Woodensuperman|<span style="background:blue; color:yellow; padding:2px;">superman</span>]]''' 13:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC) |
The segment is not sufficiently notable outside of the main show to need its own article. [[WP:FANCRUFT]]. '''--[[User:Woodensuperman|<span style="background:red; color:yellow; padding:2px;">wooden</span>]][[User talk:Woodensuperman|<span style="background:blue; color:yellow; padding:2px;">superman</span>]]''' 13:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::It is most definitely sufficiently notable outside of the main show and doesn't hurt to have its own article. [[User:Dallasansel|Dallasansel]] ([[User talk:Dallasansel|talk]]) 18:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC) |
::It is most definitely sufficiently notable outside of the main show and doesn't hurt to have its own article. [[User:Dallasansel|Dallasansel]] ([[User talk:Dallasansel|talk]]) 18:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
I oppose deleting this article. The phenomenon of a "recurring segment" is admittedly a peculiar phenomenon in broadcast media, so the standard inclusion criteria are likely ill suited for addressing this type of content. For the sake of comparison, consider various recurring segments from ''Saturday Night Live'' ([[The Barry Gibb Talk Show]], [[Coffee Talk]], [[Sprockets (Saturday Night Live)|Sprockets]], and [[:Category:Saturday Night Live sketches|many others]]) or [[The Itchy & Scratchy Show]] from ''The Simpsons''. While references could be improved, I believe deletion is unwarranted in this case. — [[User:Hiplibrarianship|'''H<small>ip</small>'''L<small>ibrarianship</small>]] [[User talk:Hiplibrarianship|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 04:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC) |
I oppose deleting this article. The phenomenon of a "recurring segment" is admittedly a peculiar phenomenon in broadcast media, so the standard inclusion criteria are likely ill suited for addressing this type of content. For the sake of comparison, consider various recurring segments from ''Saturday Night Live'' ([[The Barry Gibb Talk Show]], [[Coffee Talk]], [[Sprockets (Saturday Night Live)|Sprockets]], and [[:Category:Saturday Night Live sketches|many others]]) or [[The Itchy & Scratchy Show]] from ''The Simpsons''. While references could be improved, I believe deletion is unwarranted in this case. — [[User:Hiplibrarianship|'''H<small>ip</small>'''L<small>ibrarianship</small>]] [[User talk:Hiplibrarianship|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 04:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC) |
||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
|||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem|talk]]) 00:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Snatch Game]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
|||
Revision as of 00:43, 17 March 2018
- Snatch Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The segment is not sufficiently notable outside of the main show to need its own article. WP:FANCRUFT. --woodensuperman 13:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)::
- It is most definitely sufficiently notable outside of the main show and doesn't hurt to have its own article. Dallasansel (talk) 18:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
I oppose deleting this article. The phenomenon of a "recurring segment" is admittedly a peculiar phenomenon in broadcast media, so the standard inclusion criteria are likely ill suited for addressing this type of content. For the sake of comparison, consider various recurring segments from Saturday Night Live (The Barry Gibb Talk Show, Coffee Talk, Sprockets, and many others) or The Itchy & Scratchy Show from The Simpsons. While references could be improved, I believe deletion is unwarranted in this case. — HipLibrarianship talk 04:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)