User talk:ActiveUgar: Difference between revisions
{{checkuserblock-account}}. (TW) |
ActiveUgar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== March 2018 == |
== March 2018 == |
||
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=[[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 19:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)}} |
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=[[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 19:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)}} |
||
==Unblock== |
|||
{{unblock|reason=I wonder why this wikipedia is even called a free encyclopedia ! anyone here can edit any article without even creating an account, yet some editors want to genuinely contribute so they create an account ! I can simply edit whatever I like without a registered account, yet I chose to edit by creating one ! Then, you ban me for good as you claim that I do disruptive edits. Can anyone show me one single edit that I did here that vandalized this platform !! I used sources for every edit I did, yet this [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] is allowed to blindly rollback all my edits ! If my edits were disruptive and not contributing, so why has no one reverted each edit by itself instead of this mass rollback madness ? |
|||
I kindly ask to have one account and you can monitor my actions. Then, if I do anything disturbing, you can ban me and I would retire from doing anything here. As you can see my edits are only about sports and history, so why should I be punished forever ?! [[User:ActiveUgar|ActiveUgar]] ([[User talk:ActiveUgar#top|talk]]) 20:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 20:18, 20 March 2018
March 2018
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Unblock
ActiveUgar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I wonder why this wikipedia is even called a free encyclopedia ! anyone here can edit any article without even creating an account, yet some editors want to genuinely contribute so they create an account ! I can simply edit whatever I like without a registered account, yet I chose to edit by creating one ! Then, you ban me for good as you claim that I do disruptive edits. Can anyone show me one single edit that I did here that vandalized this platform !! I used sources for every edit I did, yet this [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] is allowed to blindly rollback all my edits ! If my edits were disruptive and not contributing, so why has no one reverted each edit by itself instead of this mass rollback madness ? I kindly ask to have one account and you can monitor my actions. Then, if I do anything disturbing, you can ban me and I would retire from doing anything here. As you can see my edits are only about sports and history, so why should I be punished forever ?! [[User:ActiveUgar|ActiveUgar]] ([[User talk:ActiveUgar#top|talk]]) 20:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I wonder why this wikipedia is even called a free encyclopedia ! anyone here can edit any article without even creating an account, yet some editors want to genuinely contribute so they create an account ! I can simply edit whatever I like without a registered account, yet I chose to edit by creating one ! Then, you ban me for good as you claim that I do disruptive edits. Can anyone show me one single edit that I did here that vandalized this platform !! I used sources for every edit I did, yet this [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] is allowed to blindly rollback all my edits ! If my edits were disruptive and not contributing, so why has no one reverted each edit by itself instead of this mass rollback madness ? I kindly ask to have one account and you can monitor my actions. Then, if I do anything disturbing, you can ban me and I would retire from doing anything here. As you can see my edits are only about sports and history, so why should I be punished forever ?! [[User:ActiveUgar|ActiveUgar]] ([[User talk:ActiveUgar#top|talk]]) 20:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I wonder why this wikipedia is even called a free encyclopedia ! anyone here can edit any article without even creating an account, yet some editors want to genuinely contribute so they create an account ! I can simply edit whatever I like without a registered account, yet I chose to edit by creating one ! Then, you ban me for good as you claim that I do disruptive edits. Can anyone show me one single edit that I did here that vandalized this platform !! I used sources for every edit I did, yet this [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] is allowed to blindly rollback all my edits ! If my edits were disruptive and not contributing, so why has no one reverted each edit by itself instead of this mass rollback madness ? I kindly ask to have one account and you can monitor my actions. Then, if I do anything disturbing, you can ban me and I would retire from doing anything here. As you can see my edits are only about sports and history, so why should I be punished forever ?! [[User:ActiveUgar|ActiveUgar]] ([[User talk:ActiveUgar#top|talk]]) 20:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}