Talk:Lurker: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Edit: (M) |
→Edit: Remove Christian Atkinson? |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Christian Atkinson? == |
|||
The article states: "For example Christian Atkinson (Jake from holloaks) is a Lurker." |
|||
As far as I can tell, this is an incredibly esoteric reference, if not blatant vandalism. Is there any reason why it should stay in this article? |
|||
[[User:4.19.111.130|4.19.111.130]] 19:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit == |
== Edit == |
||
Changes |
Changes |
||
Revision as of 19:51, 23 October 2006
Christian Atkinson?
The article states: "For example Christian Atkinson (Jake from holloaks) is a Lurker." As far as I can tell, this is an incredibly esoteric reference, if not blatant vandalism. Is there any reason why it should stay in this article? 4.19.111.130 19:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Edit
Changes
- "end of sentence." >>> "end of sentence". (It looks better. Is WP brittish or american? I think it should be the language of accessable, and I say as one that mostly communicates with americans even, that I find the american way harder to read, and as mentioned in the jargon file, that it's more logical - and even required, for logical writing)
- added sections
- "emphasized word" >>> emphasized word (because again, having a lot of quotes makes it harder to read, and bolding obviously emphasizes)
- removed dual BBS link
- added 3 buts to 1st sentence (Which sounds stupid, sorry. And this is my first
majorminor edit, so hey...)
--213.64.90.59 06:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)