User talk:Praxidicae: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tigerpunsh (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
{{you've got mail}} |
{{you've got mail}} |
||
== Rachel K Collier, == |
|||
Hi Chrissymad -you've reverted all of the changes I made to the page Rachel K Collier! if there was a bad reference or a problem, is it not possible to keep what is acceptable and remove what isn't, as opposed to just removing all of it? The page is out of date again now, so if you can help make it up to date, accepting which of my amendments are ok (and I'll amend those that aren't) that would be very useful. |
|||
Thanks |
|||
[[User:Tigerpunsh|Tigerpunsh]] ([[User talk:Tigerpunsh|talk]]) 16:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Sockpuppets == |
== Sockpuppets == |
Revision as of 16:50, 28 March 2018
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Rachel K Collier,
Hi Chrissymad -you've reverted all of the changes I made to the page Rachel K Collier! if there was a bad reference or a problem, is it not possible to keep what is acceptable and remove what isn't, as opposed to just removing all of it? The page is out of date again now, so if you can help make it up to date, accepting which of my amendments are ok (and I'll amend those that aren't) that would be very useful.
Thanks Tigerpunsh (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Sockpuppets
I'm not familiar with reporting sock puppets, but Vivyx and this IP[1] are admitted socks of WelcometoJurassicPark, and keep disrupting articles with spurious size estimates. FunkMonk (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- @FunkMonk: If you want to report sock puppet, you can go to WP:SPI. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks, that wasn't nearly as hard as I thought. FunkMonk (talk) 09:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
12:55:03, 20 March 2018 review of submission by Amc2908
Hello,
Thank you for reviewing the article. I am uncertain what do you mean by "reliable sources", as all the sources I have used are published articles in Norwegian newspapers. Could you please explain me more about this, or give me some suggestions regarding this matter?
Looking forward to your answer!
Best regards, Amc2908Amc2908 (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Amc2908 (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Sock
Hi Chrissymad, can you please check if there has been significant overlap between User:KarthikSKS and Pakistanpedia or Ptcloof khan. This user has been creating BLPs, very similar behaviour to those of blocked socks. --Saqib (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Please post content to draft/my user space
Can you userfy my contributed material at Joseph Bishop for me? I did a lot of work on it. Thanks!--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hodgdon's secret garden I am not an administrator and even if I were, copyrighted content cannot be restored. But if you'd like to double check this, you should ask @Ritchie333:. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Text was written an original phrase here, this being reworked multiple times, then another original phrase there, with appended sourcing (of course from the AP, DesNews/other Utah news sites). I can understand that the nature of the content might be problematic in a blp but where would be massive/any copyvio (resulting of course with the article's history in its entirety blanked too)?--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hodgdon's secret garden I am not an administrator, it wasn't written in "original phrasing", it was word for word taken from the source I posted on the talk page. Revision deletion deletes all the impacted text. Please ask the deleting administrator for further clarification as I'm not sure what else was removed. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I've viewed the deleted copy - and as Chrissymad mentions - a lot of it is copied directly from here. SQLQuery me! 18:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I never went there. My material related to the 1984 incident at the MTC.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- You can see in article history dozens of my contributions are blanked. None of them came from Weber State at all. They were sourced to very current news pieces in the MSM.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- I've viewed the deleted copy - and as Chrissymad mentions - a lot of it is copied directly from here. SQLQuery me! 18:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hodgdon's secret garden I am not an administrator, it wasn't written in "original phrasing", it was word for word taken from the source I posted on the talk page. Revision deletion deletes all the impacted text. Please ask the deleting administrator for further clarification as I'm not sure what else was removed. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Text was written an original phrase here, this being reworked multiple times, then another original phrase there, with appended sourcing (of course from the AP, DesNews/other Utah news sites). I can understand that the nature of the content might be problematic in a blp but where would be massive/any copyvio (resulting of course with the article's history in its entirety blanked too)?--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- This article is drawn from Weber State archived material, I see. (I sent somebody on facebbok this link, along with [2], direct transcript of this oral history by the faculty member there....) But I'm just getting paranoid.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 18:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Ritchie333 hooked it up diff. Anyway, thanks!--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Props for your efficient reporting of spambots at AIV today. Working my way through 'em... Yunshui 雲水 14:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC) |
- Yunshui Thanks! I didn't get to do my normal spambot patrol yesterday so I'm catching up today. There will be some more coming your way. ;) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- ...yay? Yunshui 雲水 15:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Good af
Hello About the page Israel Luca Gois, is seeing a mistake, he has high notoriety for us financial market, you are confusing with another person with the similar name, please help us to solve this.
- It's a violation of WMF's terms of use, so it doesn't matter. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
How to Report Spam/Vandalism In Nomination of Deletion
Thanks for your message at my talk page. If I believe certain specific nomination of deletion has not followed the policy process required, and shall be considered as vandalism (e.g. do due diligence for WP:N concern before flag it for deletion, what's the right channel to file complaint? Xinbenlv (talk) 18:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Xinbenlv You need to discuss it on the AfD. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Chrissymad: it's not about providing an opinion in the AfD debate itself, it's about how the nomination AfD was conducted. Shouldn't it be a separate place? Xinbenlv (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Xinbenlv Then take it to WP:ANI, I guess. Regardless of what you choose, you can't remove AfD tags for a discussion that is ongoing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Chrissymad, sounds good, thank you for pointing out. I will discuss there. Xinbenlv (talk) 18:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Xinbenlv Then take it to WP:ANI, I guess. Regardless of what you choose, you can't remove AfD tags for a discussion that is ongoing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
ACC
Are you sure about your handling of Request #225604 at ACC?! I think a more precise/optimum outcome would be Too similar coupled with an inquiry about whether she, herself ever created the other account! ~ Winged BladesGodric 09:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello there,
Hello Chrissymad, I found a similar care of vandalism which you reverted earlier on simplewiki. Like this one you revert and mine revert. I think those two ips have relation. I am not familiar with this kind of vandalism so I am asking you to review once. Thanks and regards.-BRP ever 16:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
SJS
Look who's back. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Joseph Bishop for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Bishop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Bishop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hodgdon's secret garden (talk • contribs) 06:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Reserved ACC requests
Please review your reserved requests and unreserve any you are not currently working. I have already broke 3 or 4. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:05, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please acknowledge this message. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- I can't login right now to acc but will as soon as I get home. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
11:07:19, 26 March 2018 review of submission by Nickjames1984
Hi Chrissymad,
I just wanted to ask which sources you'd still classify as unreliable on the article? I had made changes to address your previous comments and I'm unsure about what needs to be changed now.
Many thanks,
Nick
Nickjames1984 (talk) 11:07, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Please have a look at Uma Neha S (Singer), I think you declined this at AFC under this title Draft:Uma Neha. FITINDIA 13:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I suspect there is sockpuppetry going on. Chrissymad please take a look at the contribution of Proudpurian, Mastanineil and Raj081238 so we run SPI. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 14:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- There is, I'm filing the SPI now. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Murz97 (appears to be related) uploaded this image as own work which later used by Proudpurian in his article. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Have you filled the SPI? Raj081238 repeatedly moving their article to mainspace and I just droped a COI notice on his talk page. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Murz97 (appears to be related) uploaded this image as own work which later used by Proudpurian in his article. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Request on 16:52:01, 26 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Atszostek
Hi Chrissymad -
I have a question about reliable sources for this draft article for Endorfin Foods I submitted a few months ago. The company recently received coverage on Good Day Sacramento (CBS): http://gooddaysacramento.cbslocal.com/video/3812771-check-this-out/ and CBS SF Bay Area: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwH3FkM3vH0
Would these sources qualify as reliable sources if I incorporate them as references into the draft?
Thank you for your help, Atszostek (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Atszostek (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Atszostek, local sources such as these are fine for verification purposes. The issue you might find is that using local sources don't do much for notability purposes (local news outlets frequently feature local businesses, so it's not "note-worthy" news). However, if you have a mix of local and national sources that should be covered. Primefac (talk) 12:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Page for deletion
Hello! The page I created is in no way a promotional page for a company or an individual. It's a page for a a rap/pop singer, just like any other page for a musician. Yes, the sources may not be that good but that's all available in English language. I have some links but they're in different languages. Can they be used as references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoveAndArt (talk • contribs) 20:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well considering the links you've currently used are not at all appropriate, yes, you need to add some actual reliable sources, it doesn't matter what language. And as far as the tone, yes it is still incredibly promotional. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Page for deletion.. again.
I don't know how to response to your reply to earlier section so I had to add a new one. I edited the page, removed some parts which may seem promotional and added a few links. Hope that works. Is the page still up for deletion after all that? LoveAndArt (talk) 20:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Unmarked Draft:Frans Plooij as under review.
Hey! It had been 9 days since you marked it as under review. I unmarked it so that it can get broader attention. Thanks! Dial911 (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Dial911: After looking at the placement of the sources I have declined the AfC request and tagged it for speedy deletion because the entire article was copied from this link (94.5% violation suspected). GSS (talk|c|em) 06:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks GSS-1987! Dial911 (talk) 08:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)