User talk:Megan warren613/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 01:02, 29 March 2018

Peer Review

I think your topic is very important. It will be interesting to find out where it started and how it came to be.Brianna Bridgewater (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review of my article! Megan warren613 (talk) 20:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article Draft

Megan, You've got some really good sources here, and your draft is well done. My only suggestion is to be sure that you're not overemphasizing one particular victim of sexual harassment. It is one good example, but it should not be the only one in the article.JAirhart 13:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airhartcomp (talk • contribs)

Thank you for your review of my article! Megan warren613 (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PEER REVIEW: I like your flow of words. Since Dr. Luke wasn't convicted you should say "alleged attacker" or put "attacker" in parenthesis. You're writing is very neutral and informative. --Jessicaferman (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Thank you for your review of my article!
 [[User:Megan warren613|Megan warren613]] ([[User talk:Megan warren613|talk]]) 20:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
+PEER REVIEW: I like your flow of words. Since Dr. Luke wasn't convicted you should say "alleged attacker" or put "attacker" in parenthesis. You're writing is very neutral and informative. --[[User:Jessicaferman|Jessicaferman]] ([[User talk:Jessicaferman|talk]]) 01:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)