User talk:Cruizir: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:48, 5 April 2018

Cruizir, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cruizir! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hjcjiu. You cannot state that this person is a sockpuppet when no case has been filed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hjcjiu, let alone proven. See WP:SPI for instructions on how to file a sockpuppeetry report. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What????? Cruizir (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, yes, the Hjcjiu pages weren't needed but I fail to see how they're attack pages. Cruizir (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry is a serious crime. When accusing somebody of sockpuppetry, the first thing to do is gather some hard evidence. Build a case around that evidence, and file your case at WP:SPI where others will assess it and act appropriately.

Instead, with these four edits (also the creation of Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hjcjiu and Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hjcjiu, which have since been deleted), you have essentially convicted somebody unilaterally, without any evidence being presented. Please leave such tagging - including the creation of the category pages - to the closing administrator. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of such were based on edits to the Malu Trevejo page, with the exception of the suspected with was based off of edits to NBA Youngboy (a page one of the IPs edited). Cruizir (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 :::[[WP:SOCK|Sockpuppetry]] is a serious crime. When accusing somebody of sockpuppetry, the ''first'' thing to do is gather some hard evidence. Build a case around that evidence, and file your case at [[WP:SPI]] where others will assess it and act appropriately.
 :::Instead, with [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions/Cruizir&namespace=3&offset=20180402202000&limit=4 these four edits] (also the creation of {{cl|Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hjcjiu}} and {{cl|Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hjcjiu}}, which have since been deleted), you have essentially convicted somebody unilaterally, without any evidence being presented. Please leave such tagging - including the creation of the category pages - to the closing [[WP:SYSOP|administrator]]. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 19:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
-::All of such were based on edits to the Mall Trevejo page, with the exception of the suspected with was based off of edits to NBA Youngboy (a page one of the IPs edited). [[User:Cruizir|Cruizir]] ([[User talk:Cruizir#top|talk]]) 19:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
+::All of such were based on edits to the Malu Trevejo page, with the exception of the suspected with was based off of edits to NBA Youngboy (a page one of the IPs edited). [[User:Cruizir|Cruizir]] ([[User talk:Cruizir#top|talk]]) 19:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)