Jump to content

Talk:Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
NihlusBOT (talk | contribs)
149,040 edits
HappyGod (talk | contribs)
123 edits
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
{{WikiProject Food}}
{{WikiProject Food}}
}}
}}

==Article's Accusatory Tone==
Does the opening paragraph of this article really need to be a huge bold statement about how the company does not pay tax? This seems to be a bit accusatory and biased. Surely the opening paragraph and general lead in should be a statement about who and what the Sanitarium is, not a statement about it tax exempt status??? [[User:HappyGod|HappyGod]] ([[User talk:HappyGod|talk]]) 07:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)




Line 11: Line 14:
iv added the source for my tax break addition--[[User:Whywhywhy|Whywhywhy]] 06:26, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
iv added the source for my tax break addition--[[User:Whywhywhy|Whywhywhy]] 06:26, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
: Have changes been made since that report (which was 2001) and what is different? The [[Seventh-day Adventist Church]] in Australia which goes under the business name of Australasian Conferencing Association has been incorporated since then and now Sanitarium is owned by a separate business, Australian Health and Nutrition Association. This makes me suspicious that changes have occured. Anyone have any clues? [[User:MyNameIsNotBob|MyNameIsNotBob]] 00:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
: Have changes been made since that report (which was 2001) and what is different? The [[Seventh-day Adventist Church]] in Australia which goes under the business name of Australasian Conferencing Association has been incorporated since then and now Sanitarium is owned by a separate business, Australian Health and Nutrition Association. This makes me suspicious that changes have occured. Anyone have any clues? [[User:MyNameIsNotBob|MyNameIsNotBob]] 00:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
::I'm pretty sure it does get some tax cuts. However, it does not support the church in Australia - it supports it in the Pacific islands. -[[User:Colin MacLaurin|Colin MacLaurin]] 14:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
::I'm pretty sure it does get some tax cuts. However, it does not support the church in Australia - it supports it in the Pacific islands. -[[User:Colin MacLaurin|Colin MacLaurin]] 14:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


:: Please look more closely into the tax exemption issue, as in Australia at least, the tax exemption is likely to stem from the company being owned by a socially benevolent incorporated association, which can be either religious or non-religious. What is important is to obtain and read the Articles of Incorporation for the incorporated associations, and find out what the Objects of the Associations are. Paul Gardner-Stephen. 08:17, 4 March 2013 (GMT+13) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.173.215.22|203.173.215.22]] ([[User talk:203.173.215.22|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:: Please look more closely into the tax exemption issue, as in Australia at least, the tax exemption is likely to stem from the company being owned by a socially benevolent incorporated association, which can be either religious or non-religious. What is important is to obtain and read the Articles of Incorporation for the incorporated associations, and find out what the Objects of the Associations are. Paul Gardner-Stephen. 08:17, 4 March 2013 (GMT+13) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.173.215.22|203.173.215.22]] ([[User talk:203.173.215.22|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 07:54, 19 April 2018

Article's Accusatory Tone

Does the opening paragraph of this article really need to be a huge bold statement about how the company does not pay tax? This seems to be a bit accusatory and biased. Surely the opening paragraph and general lead in should be a statement about who and what the Sanitarium is, not a statement about it tax exempt status??? HappyGod (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Untitled

iv added the source for my tax break addition--Whywhywhy 06:26, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Have changes been made since that report (which was 2001) and what is different? The Seventh-day Adventist Church in Australia which goes under the business name of Australasian Conferencing Association has been incorporated since then and now Sanitarium is owned by a separate business, Australian Health and Nutrition Association. This makes me suspicious that changes have occured. Anyone have any clues? MyNameIsNotBob 00:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure it does get some tax cuts. However, it does not support the church in Australia - it supports it in the Pacific islands. -Colin MacLaurin 14:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please look more closely into the tax exemption issue, as in Australia at least, the tax exemption is likely to stem from the company being owned by a socially benevolent incorporated association, which can be either religious or non-religious. What is important is to obtain and read the Articles of Incorporation for the incorporated associations, and find out what the Objects of the Associations are. Paul Gardner-Stephen. 08:17, 4 March 2013 (GMT+13) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.215.22 (talk)

Linking in the Summary Stub

The CEO Kevin Jackson should not be linked to the wrestler Kevin Jackson. They are not the same person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.219.103 (talk) 17:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sanitarium brand.gif

Image:Sanitarium brand.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sanitarium Products List Incorrect

Weetabix is listed as a Sanitarium product in the UK and USA - they don't make it and do not own the Brand Name - The Weetabix Company Limited in the UK is teh owner of the brand- and are not associated with Sanitarium. The Sanitarium product is Weet-Bix. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weetabix_Limited There are current issues in New Zealand with Sanitarium blocking imports of Weetabix on the grounds that it infringes the Trademark they own (weet-bix)but they do not own, nor have they ever owned Weetabix. http://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-find-number?detailsrequested=C&trademark=2060869--202.174.163.135 (talk) 06:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

article biased??????????????

reading this article just seems like one big advertisement. there is a very small amount of information about the company, the bulk of the article is its brand names.

Pga1965 (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sanitarium_Health_and_Wellbeing_Company&oldid=837187703"