Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of firewalls: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
IlariS (talk | contribs)
42 edits
No edit summary
re - "notability", moved post down (newer posts at bottom)
Line 12: Line 12:
| minthreadstoarchive = 2
| minthreadstoarchive = 2
}}
}}

⚫
== Notes ==

⚫
WatchGuard missing or not qualified?
⚫
--[[User:IlariS|Ilari Stenroth]] ([[User talk:IlariS|talk]]) 19:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)


== Glasswire ==
== Glasswire ==
Line 25: Line 20:


This should be out in the open, Mr.Hmm, gonzopancho, and others, are actual employees at pfSense/netgate, and have been engaged in a campaign of self promotion, and systematic deletion of their competitors mentions and pages. the OPNSense page has been completely deleted, its mentions removed from here by forementioned Mr.Hmm, as he cites that he considers the project "non note-worthy", and their team has also been very hostile in other venues as of late, in regards to anything related to OPNSense. pfSense is in process of switching to a subscription based model, and are fighting vigorously to keep their customer base locked in, and eventually suck them all into support contracts. They seek to prevent their users via mis/dis-information from seeing the option of switching their existing hardware over to OPNSense and other platforms. As OPNSense's feature base is nearly identical to pfSense making it an almost seamless transition, they have targetted it in an effort to prevent customers from doing this. OPNSense originally split off of pfSense itself due to the intent of netgate/pfsense staff to convert the project to a paid/subscription model and little by little make it a non-opensource project, like what oracle has done to projects such as mysql, java, etc... [[User:MarcusArelius|MarcusArelius]] ([[User talk:MarcusArelius|talk]]) 20:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
This should be out in the open, Mr.Hmm, gonzopancho, and others, are actual employees at pfSense/netgate, and have been engaged in a campaign of self promotion, and systematic deletion of their competitors mentions and pages. the OPNSense page has been completely deleted, its mentions removed from here by forementioned Mr.Hmm, as he cites that he considers the project "non note-worthy", and their team has also been very hostile in other venues as of late, in regards to anything related to OPNSense. pfSense is in process of switching to a subscription based model, and are fighting vigorously to keep their customer base locked in, and eventually suck them all into support contracts. They seek to prevent their users via mis/dis-information from seeing the option of switching their existing hardware over to OPNSense and other platforms. As OPNSense's feature base is nearly identical to pfSense making it an almost seamless transition, they have targetted it in an effort to prevent customers from doing this. OPNSense originally split off of pfSense itself due to the intent of netgate/pfsense staff to convert the project to a paid/subscription model and little by little make it a non-opensource project, like what oracle has done to projects such as mysql, java, etc... [[User:MarcusArelius|MarcusArelius]] ([[User talk:MarcusArelius|talk]]) 20:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

⚫
== Notes ==

⚫
WatchGuard missing or not qualified?
⚫
--[[User:IlariS|Ilari Stenroth]] ([[User talk:IlariS|talk]]) 19:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

:{{ping|IlariS}} Entries, especially in large lists of commercial topics, should be "notable" in Wikipedia's sense of the term (see [[WP:GNG]]) and already have a sourced stand-alone article. See also [[WP:WTAF]], an essay with some additional advice. [[User:GermanJoe|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe|talk]]) 07:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:06, 24 April 2018

WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconComputer Security: Computing Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as High-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:
Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...
  • Review importance and quality of existing articles
  • Identify categories related to Computer Security
  • Tag related articles
  • Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
  • Identify articles for improvement
  • Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
  • Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Glasswire

Glasswire firewall sends http information to 52.85.107.197 (Registered under Amazone), 90.9 kb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.91.64.164 (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Systematic Abuse of this and other firewall pages by pfSense Staff

This should be out in the open, Mr.Hmm, gonzopancho, and others, are actual employees at pfSense/netgate, and have been engaged in a campaign of self promotion, and systematic deletion of their competitors mentions and pages. the OPNSense page has been completely deleted, its mentions removed from here by forementioned Mr.Hmm, as he cites that he considers the project "non note-worthy", and their team has also been very hostile in other venues as of late, in regards to anything related to OPNSense. pfSense is in process of switching to a subscription based model, and are fighting vigorously to keep their customer base locked in, and eventually suck them all into support contracts. They seek to prevent their users via mis/dis-information from seeing the option of switching their existing hardware over to OPNSense and other platforms. As OPNSense's feature base is nearly identical to pfSense making it an almost seamless transition, they have targetted it in an effort to prevent customers from doing this. OPNSense originally split off of pfSense itself due to the intent of netgate/pfsense staff to convert the project to a paid/subscription model and little by little make it a non-opensource project, like what oracle has done to projects such as mysql, java, etc... MarcusArelius (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

WatchGuard missing or not qualified? --Ilari Stenroth (talk) 19:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@IlariS: Entries, especially in large lists of commercial topics, should be "notable" in Wikipedia's sense of the term (see WP:GNG) and already have a sourced stand-alone article. See also WP:WTAF, an essay with some additional advice. GermanJoe (talk) 07:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comparison_of_firewalls&oldid=837987680"