User talk:Kautilya2018: Difference between revisions
Warning: Edit warring on Indian provincial elections, 1946. (TW) |
Kautilya2018 (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
''Please do not reinstate contentious edits without discussion, and do not write essays in edit summaries. You should open a discussion on the talk page and resolve the issues before making any further edits.''<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 11:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC) |
''Please do not reinstate contentious edits without discussion, and do not write essays in edit summaries. You should open a discussion on the talk page and resolve the issues before making any further edits.''<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 11:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
== The editor Kautilya3 believes his edits to be God's own word! == |
|||
The editor Kautilya3 who keeps on reverting edits that are in the public domain, seems to assume his word as God's own word? |
|||
Why can't Muslim League, who believed in a separate state for Muslims and fought elections on the same agenda, be listed accordingly? |
|||
Similarly, what is there to hide about Hindu Mahasabha? Didn't it believe in a "united and self-governing" Indian nation? (Citations included in another wiki page on Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha). |
|||
Why the editor has to influence wiki readers in a certain way with his personal description of Hindu Mahasabha by describing it as an outfit who fought elections on militant Hindu platform without providing any credible Citations to it and suppressing Hindu Mahasabha's own accepted principles of "united and self-governing" Indian nation which was part of its constitution? |
|||
By suppressing facts, the editor is also going against the information provided on Hindu Mahasabha on another wiki page dedicated to it. |
|||
The clear aim of this editor though very senior as far as wiki editorship is concerned, is my way or highway. He clearly wants to intimidate new editors with his seniority thereby creating conflicts when there are none! |
|||
Clearly the senior editor at wiki is himself violating core wiki editing policy of maintain a neutral point of view by adding content without corresponding citation! [[User:Kautilya2018|Kautilya2018]] ([[User talk:Kautilya2018#top|talk]]) 12:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:07, 25 April 2018
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Indian provincial elections, 1946. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.
Please do not reinstate contentious edits without discussion, and do not write essays in edit summaries. You should open a discussion on the talk page and resolve the issues before making any further edits. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
The editor Kautilya3 believes his edits to be God's own word!
The editor Kautilya3 who keeps on reverting edits that are in the public domain, seems to assume his word as God's own word? Why can't Muslim League, who believed in a separate state for Muslims and fought elections on the same agenda, be listed accordingly? Similarly, what is there to hide about Hindu Mahasabha? Didn't it believe in a "united and self-governing" Indian nation? (Citations included in another wiki page on Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha). Why the editor has to influence wiki readers in a certain way with his personal description of Hindu Mahasabha by describing it as an outfit who fought elections on militant Hindu platform without providing any credible Citations to it and suppressing Hindu Mahasabha's own accepted principles of "united and self-governing" Indian nation which was part of its constitution? By suppressing facts, the editor is also going against the information provided on Hindu Mahasabha on another wiki page dedicated to it. The clear aim of this editor though very senior as far as wiki editorship is concerned, is my way or highway. He clearly wants to intimidate new editors with his seniority thereby creating conflicts when there are none! Clearly the senior editor at wiki is himself violating core wiki editing policy of maintain a neutral point of view by adding content without corresponding citation! Kautilya2018 (talk) 12:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC)