User talk:Nommonomanac: Difference between revisions
m fixed link in preparation of killing odd redirect |
Article Licensing |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
Thought I'd bring the [[Image_talk:Canallock.png]] page to your attention, since I can't do anything about the problem at the moment (no imaging software), and you're the original artist - you may be able to fix it! --[[User:Steinsky|Steinsky]] 23:50, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
Thought I'd bring the [[Image_talk:Canallock.png]] page to your attention, since I can't do anything about the problem at the moment (no imaging software), and you're the original artist - you may be able to fix it! --[[User:Steinsky|Steinsky]] 23:50, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
||
== Article Licensing == |
|||
Hi, I've [[User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project|started a drive]] to get users to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the [[Creative Commons]] Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 [[Creative Commons License|License]]s or into the [[public domain]] if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the [[GFDL]], but it allows '''other projects''', such as [[WikiTravel]], to use our articles. Since you are among the [[Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits|top 2000]] Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: |
|||
*[[User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ|Multi-Licensing FAQ]] - Lots of questions answered |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|Multi-Licensing Guide]] |
|||
*[[User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project|Free the Rambot Articles Project]] |
|||
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" template into their user page, but there are other options at [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace#Licensing Templates|Template messages/User namespace]]. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: |
|||
:'''Option 1''' |
|||
:<nowiki>I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:</nowiki> |
|||
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki> |
|||
'''OR''' |
|||
:'''Option 2''' |
|||
:<nowiki>I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:</nowiki> |
|||
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki> |
|||
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" with "'''<nowiki>{{MultiLicensePD}}</nowiki>'''". If you only prefer using the [[GFDL]], I would like to know that too. ''Please let me know'' what you think at my '''[[User talk:Ram-Man|talk page]]'''. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- [[User:Ram-Man|Ram-Man]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new comment]| [[User talk:Ram-Man|talk)]] |
Revision as of 22:44, 10 December 2004
Welcome to userland! I hope you enjoy your floating thingy. :) --mav
-- It's lovely. We spend happy nights in together... -Nommo
Wot free drink??? I never got a free drink!!!! quercus robur
-- Case of being in the right place at the right time... -Nommo
Floating thingy? Please tell me what this is, I'd like to know more... User:Willsmith
-- at the side of the screen... that menu thing... it can be made to stay there when you scroll down a page. It floats! It's great! Like it's on a cussion of air... like that stadium in Japan... - Nommo
It was definitely Roger Meddows-Taylor (Queen) who was involved in Band Aid, please see publicity shot on http://hk.geocities.com/popmusic80/main.htm
The above website seems to have moved the picture, Roger Taylor (Queen) is in the back row between Tony Hadley and Simon Le Bon. http://hk.geocities.com/popmusic80/main.htm Mintguy 08:30 Apr 19, 2003 (UTC)
- eeek. You're right, I'm wrong. I even went so far as to download the "Do they know it's Christmas" video using Kazaa, anticipating seeing Rog banging away at the drums, which of course he wasn't. Sorry. It was a poor quality picture and I'd convinced myself that was him, but now I look at it again it looks less like him. Damn.
With regard to The Commercial Album does the tracklisting on the LP carry over to the CD? -- sugarfish 02:11, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)
I would like you to see the Talk Sega Genesis section on another idea I have. I want to create a separate Article for the Megadrive and put in information applying to the Megadrive in it. Likewise, information regarding the Genesis goes to the Genesis section.
This system is used with Nintendo Entertainment System and Famicom - WhisperToMe
Don't move pages unless you know what you are doing! All London Underground stations have pages Station Name tube station. Ed g2s 16:48, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Lindisfarne - crikey, you're right about Cul de Sac. I have grown up under a misapprehension! Thanks for spotting that. --Nevilley 07:42, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Thought I'd bring the Image_talk:Canallock.png page to your attention, since I can't do anything about the problem at the moment (no imaging software), and you're the original artist - you may be able to fix it! --Steinsky 23:50, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)