Talk:Rick Kirby: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Oppose''': It's notable, and has received independent and significant coverage. Merging it with [[Rick Kirby]] would give the one sculpture a disproportionate weight compared to his other works; this happened when in the previous discussion someone merged it without waiting for consensus, causing another person to (incorrectly) state that "it seems certain that ... he only has one sculpture worth writing about in detail". --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 16:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''': It's notable, and has received independent and significant coverage. Merging it with [[Rick Kirby]] would give the one sculpture a disproportionate weight compared to his other works; this happened when in the previous discussion someone merged it without waiting for consensus, causing another person to (incorrectly) state that "it seems certain that ... he only has one sculpture worth writing about in detail". --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 16:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''': as per [[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 16:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''': as per [[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]]. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 16:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' Much of the coverage seems to be about the visitor center, of which this is only a part,. Disproportionate coverage can be dealt with by including only the actually relevant material. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 20:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:32, 28 April 2018
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 February 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from Rick Kirby appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Merger from Sutton Hoo Helmet (sculpture)
It appeared from the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sutton Hoo Helmet (sculpture) that there was some sentiment for merging Sutton Hoo Helmet (sculpture) into the Rick Kirby article, especially among those who felt that this particular sculpture was not independently notable. I am reproposing that merger on that basis, and opening discussion. I have notified the participants in the Afd of this discussion. As I see it much of the material contained in the scupture article is not actually about the sculpture, and would not be necessary to keep (although it will remain in the redirects history after merger.) --Bejnar (talk) 15:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Far more notable than many subjects of such articles. Johnbod (talk) 16:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose: It's notable, and has received independent and significant coverage. Merging it with Rick Kirby would give the one sculpture a disproportionate weight compared to his other works; this happened when in the previous discussion someone merged it without waiting for consensus, causing another person to (incorrectly) state that "it seems certain that ... he only has one sculpture worth writing about in detail". --Usernameunique (talk) 16:25, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose: as per Usernameunique. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support Much of the coverage seems to be about the visitor center, of which this is only a part,. Disproportionate coverage can be dealt with by including only the actually relevant material. DGG ( talk ) 20:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles