User talk:Kryan8/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Keyri's Peer Review: new section |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
#3 Each edit feels substantial because a lot of new information was added and it relates to the topic of depression. However, citations should be added. |
#3 Each edit feels substantial because a lot of new information was added and it relates to the topic of depression. However, citations should be added. |
||
#4 There are a few grammatical and spelling mistakes to fix and the sentence structure is sometimes repetitive, but it is pretty clear to understand and informational. |
#4 There are a few grammatical and spelling mistakes to fix and the sentence structure is sometimes repetitive, but it is pretty clear to understand and informational. |
||
[[User:Keyriambrocio|Keyriambrocio]] ([[User talk:Keyriambrocio|talk]]) 16:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:50, 1 May 2018
Keyri's Peer Review
- 1 These edits are unbiased. At the end, the stereotype of depression being a woman's disease is discussed, but this is not biased because she is merely showing a perspective.
- 2 No citations are included within these edits, other than mentioning WebMD in the sentences, but there should be citations.
- 3 Each edit feels substantial because a lot of new information was added and it relates to the topic of depression. However, citations should be added.
- 4 There are a few grammatical and spelling mistakes to fix and the sentence structure is sometimes repetitive, but it is pretty clear to understand and informational.