User talk:Keyriambrocio/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:57, 1 May 2018

Peer Review by Catherine: 1. The edits made sound neutral. no biased language is used; the edits sound like an entry within an encyclopedia. The sources that a re used appear to also be unbiased, so there is no opinion evident within the edits. 2. The citations are placed correctly within the edits. There is also a significant amount of citations included. 3. The edit is a significant amount of data that feels quite substantial within the article as a whole. I feel the information being added is relevant and needs to be included. Each edit has a strong amount of factual information, making it a substantial edit, along with one or two citations to back up the info. 4. In regard to the language, I feel that everything is worded clearly and in a professional manner. The sentence structure is strong and the sentences flow nicely. I did not see any grammatical/ spelling errors. Cpara2 (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for the feedback. I will try adding more citations to see if any more are needed with different sources to make sure I am getting a variety 
    different perspectives. I will also try to find more information to add to this article edit because the genocide is relevant to the Mayan people's 
    history. I will continue to make sure that any information added is unbiased and neutral, following the Wikipedia guidelines. I will see if I can make 
    any changes to the sentence structure to make sure that it is still clear, easy to understand, and well-written. Thanks again.
    Keyriambrocio (talk) 16:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]