Jump to content

Talk:Developing country: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 63: Line 63:
I've done some work on a new section on common characteristics. I think this is important for laypersons to grasp some of the problems that people in developing countries are dealing with. I looked around in related Wikipedia articles to see if there was a good description anywhere. So far, I have not found much yet. However, I did find this paragaph under [[Third World]] and am thinking of perhaps moving and updating it to here (the word "Third World" would be replaced with "developing country"). However, this could also open up a mine field as there might be many controversial issues there. What do you think? This is the paragraph in question:
I've done some work on a new section on common characteristics. I think this is important for laypersons to grasp some of the problems that people in developing countries are dealing with. I looked around in related Wikipedia articles to see if there was a good description anywhere. So far, I have not found much yet. However, I did find this paragaph under [[Third World]] and am thinking of perhaps moving and updating it to here (the word "Third World" would be replaced with "developing country"). However, this could also open up a mine field as there might be many controversial issues there. What do you think? This is the paragraph in question:


''However, despite decades of receiving aid and experiencing different development models (which have had very little success), many Third World countries' economies are still dependent on developed countries, and are deep in debt.<ref>[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_countries.htm "First, Second and Third World"]</ref> There is now a growing debate about why Third World countries remain impoverished and underdeveloped after all this time. Many argue that current methods of aid are not working and are calling for reducing foreign aid (and therefore dependency) and utilizing different economic theories than the traditional mainstream theories from the West.<ref>[[Ozay Mehmet|Mehmet, Ozay]], (1995). Mainstream economic development theories have failed to come up with a model that appropriately supports development in the Third World. Westernizing the Third World (Ch 1), Routledge</ref> Historically, development and aid have not accomplished the goals they were meant to, and currently the global gap between the rich and poor is greater than ever,<ref name="Westra">Westra, Richard (2011). "Renewing Socialist Development in the Third World", [[Journal of Contemporary Asia]], 41(4): 519-543.</ref> though not everybody agrees with this.<ref name="cliodynamics.ru">Korotayev A., Zinkina J. [http://cliodynamics.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=361&Itemid=1 On the structure of the present-day convergence. ''Campus-Wide Information Systems''. Vol. 31 No. 2/3, 2014, pp. 139-152]</ref>''
''However, despite decades of receiving aid and experiencing different development models (which have had very little success), many Third World countries' economies are still dependent on developed countries, and are deep in debt.<ref>[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_countries.htm "First, Second and Third World"]</ref> There is now a growing debate about why Third World countries remain impoverished and underdeveloped after all this time. Many argue that current methods of aid are not working and are calling for reducing foreign aid (and therefore dependency) and utilizing different economic theories than the traditional mainstream theories from the West.<ref>[[Ozay Mehmet|Mehmet, Ozay]], (1995). Mainstream economic development theories have failed to come up with a model that appropriately supports development in the Third World. Westernizing the Third World (Ch 1), Routledge</ref> Historically, development and aid have not accomplished the goals they were meant to, and currently the global gap between the rich and poor is greater than ever,<ref name="Westra">Westra, Richard (2011). "Renewing Socialist Development in the Third World", [[Journal of Contemporary Asia]], 41(4): 519-543.</ref> though not everybody agrees with this.<ref name="cliodynamics.ru">Korotayev A., Zinkina J. [http://cliodynamics.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=361&Itemid=1 On the structure of the present-day convergence. ''Campus-Wide Information Systems''. Vol. 31 No. 2/3, 2014, pp. 139-152]</ref>'' [[User:EMsmile|EMsmile]] ([[User talk:EMsmile|talk]]) 02:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


[[User:EMsmile|EMsmile]] ([[User talk:EMsmile|talk]]) 02:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
: I think I am making good progress on this section on common characteristics (still not finished). I've just added a sub-section on global warming. Will still do more work on that.[[User:EMsmile|EMsmile]] ([[User talk:EMsmile|talk]]) 13:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:13, 4 May 2018

Peer Review

I really like the idea of adding the new section of "Growth" and it will be great to correct grammar mistakes. User:1993vl

1993jl (talk) 22:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Grammar is really important in this types of articles because it gives them more reliability. The work you are doing in cleaning up all the grammar mistakes in the article is vital. Your Growth section looks like it will be really interesting for the readers of this article. The sub sections look really interesting I am looking forward in reading them, this is a really broad topic so try to cover as much information and reasons as possible. Great Work. User:1993vl

1994ac (talk) 22:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?

The phrase "an unfetted advocate of free market rapi" needs to get fixed by someone who has some idea what it might be intended to meam. Poihths (talk) 22:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Poihths (talk) 22:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Developing country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improve section on public health risks

The section on public health risks could be beefed up and become its own section rather than be under "trends". I haven't worked on this article before so I am just wondering if others have thought about this in the past. EMsmile (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit of work on this but it needs more work. See also below. EMsmile (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Improve section on common characteristics

I've done some work on a new section on common characteristics. I think this is important for laypersons to grasp some of the problems that people in developing countries are dealing with. I looked around in related Wikipedia articles to see if there was a good description anywhere. So far, I have not found much yet. However, I did find this paragaph under Third World and am thinking of perhaps moving and updating it to here (the word "Third World" would be replaced with "developing country"). However, this could also open up a mine field as there might be many controversial issues there. What do you think? This is the paragraph in question:

However, despite decades of receiving aid and experiencing different development models (which have had very little success), many Third World countries' economies are still dependent on developed countries, and are deep in debt.[1] There is now a growing debate about why Third World countries remain impoverished and underdeveloped after all this time. Many argue that current methods of aid are not working and are calling for reducing foreign aid (and therefore dependency) and utilizing different economic theories than the traditional mainstream theories from the West.[2] Historically, development and aid have not accomplished the goals they were meant to, and currently the global gap between the rich and poor is greater than ever,[3] though not everybody agrees with this.[4] EMsmile (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think I am making good progress on this section on common characteristics (still not finished). I've just added a sub-section on global warming. Will still do more work on that.EMsmile (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "First, Second and Third World"
  2. ^ Mehmet, Ozay, (1995). Mainstream economic development theories have failed to come up with a model that appropriately supports development in the Third World. Westernizing the Third World (Ch 1), Routledge
  3. ^ Westra, Richard (2011). "Renewing Socialist Development in the Third World", Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(4): 519-543.
  4. ^ Korotayev A., Zinkina J. On the structure of the present-day convergence. Campus-Wide Information Systems. Vol. 31 No. 2/3, 2014, pp. 139-152