Talk:2018 Paris knife attack: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Contested deletion: comment |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Your rather subjective and extremist political position does not seem to be a valid reason for retaining the article. Indeed, it does not bear any apparent relation to the relative relevance to the notability of the event at all. No offence meant, "TRUMP 2020!".--[[Special:Contributions/90.179.120.43|90.179.120.43]] ([[User talk:90.179.120.43|talk]]) 23:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC) |
:Your rather subjective and extremist political position does not seem to be a valid reason for retaining the article. Indeed, it does not bear any apparent relation to the relative relevance to the notability of the event at all. No offence meant, "TRUMP 2020!".--[[Special:Contributions/90.179.120.43|90.179.120.43]] ([[User talk:90.179.120.43|talk]]) 23:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
*I removed a bunch of nonsense, below. The proposed deletion was challenged by {{U|Zigzig20s}}, and that should have been enough: you, IP 90, had no valid reason for restoring it, but {{U|Number 57}} declined it anyway. Now, there is no evidence yet of terrorism, and {{U|The Diaz}} and {{U|Hiddenstranger}} should ''really'' consider actually reading the rules for this encyclopedic website, so I removed those categories and claims. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC) |
*I removed a bunch of nonsense, below. The proposed deletion was challenged by {{U|Zigzig20s}}, and that should have been enough: you, IP 90, had no valid reason for restoring it, but {{U|Number 57}} declined it anyway. Now, there is no evidence yet of terrorism, and {{U|The Diaz}} and {{U|Hiddenstranger}} should ''really'' consider actually reading the rules for this encyclopedic website, so I removed those categories and claims. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
::OK, thanks. I'm actually quite content with the results, although still not entirely convinced that the whole ''affaire'' is notable enough for an enycyclopedia article ([[wp:recentism]], [[wp:NOTNEWS]], attempts at propaganda by diverse political extremists and so on), and as {{U|Zigzig20s}} gave no actual explanation for the challenge to my proposal I felt rather justified in restoring it. (Also I'm a bit ''tired and emotional'', so to speak.) My apologies for any troubles I made. -[[Special:Contributions/90.179.120.43|90.179.120.43]] ([[User talk:90.179.120.43|talk]]) 00:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:22, 13 May 2018
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Liberalism is a mental disorder. TRUMP 2020!)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.194.54.11 (talk)
- Your rather subjective and extremist political position does not seem to be a valid reason for retaining the article. Indeed, it does not bear any apparent relation to the relative relevance to the notability of the event at all. No offence meant, "TRUMP 2020!".--90.179.120.43 (talk) 23:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- I removed a bunch of nonsense, below. The proposed deletion was challenged by Zigzig20s, and that should have been enough: you, IP 90, had no valid reason for restoring it, but Number 57 declined it anyway. Now, there is no evidence yet of terrorism, and The Diaz and Hiddenstranger should really consider actually reading the rules for this encyclopedic website, so I removed those categories and claims. Drmies (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I'm actually quite content with the results, although still not entirely convinced that the whole affaire is notable enough for an enycyclopedia article (wp:recentism, wp:NOTNEWS, attempts at propaganda by diverse political extremists and so on), and as Zigzig20s gave no actual explanation for the challenge to my proposal I felt rather justified in restoring it. (Also I'm a bit tired and emotional, so to speak.) My apologies for any troubles I made. -90.179.120.43 (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)