Jump to content

User:ErraticGeologist/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
edit
added peer review assignment info
Line 27: Line 27:
* The Nazca is an aseismic ridge<ref name=":6" />
* The Nazca is an aseismic ridge<ref name=":6" />
* The exposed Nazca Ridge is 200 km wide, >1000 km long, and up to 1.5 km high. 900 km of ridge have subducted already<ref name=":7" />
* The exposed Nazca Ridge is 200 km wide, >1000 km long, and up to 1.5 km high. 900 km of ridge have subducted already<ref name=":7" />

Peer Review Assignment

* [[Special:PrefixIndex/User:Beauh2|Beauh2 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.]] and [[Special:PrefixIndex/User:Seiji34|Seiji34 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.]]
* <u>'''Due by May 19th! Do before weekend, gone 19th and 20th!'''</u>


== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==

Revision as of 18:14, 14 May 2018

Assignment 2: Evaluating Wiki articles

Plate tectonics

  • Former feature article, demoted in 2008
  • Missing lots of citations
  • My understanding is that the geo community didn't fully accept this until the late 60s, and 50s to 60s is a broad time frame. this seems biased.
  • Different sections contradict the time frame of widespread acceptance claims presented in the introduction
  • The section on continent could use some geologic timeline terminology, instead of just numerical ages. Again, so many missing citations...
  • Maybe it's convention (haven't spent much time on Wikipedia before), but I find the reference section confusing that way it is sectioned off as references, books, and articles, but there are still some full references in the references that could be in the books or articles area... I think I comprehensive section would be best
  • Overall I found this article to be poorly cited, despite plenty of reference material, and to be contradictory as to dates of acceptance

Convergent Boundary

  • Not a bad article, good for a layperson to understand the basics, but needs so many more sources of information and citations.
  • Could use more figures to illustrate processes. It's hard to visualize things like volcanic arcs if you have little to no experience on the subject!

Nazca Ridge

This article needs geographic, geologic, and spatial information about the Nazca Ridge. Also, tectonic implications of oblique ridge subduction should be addressed. Finally, continental crust deformation implications of the Nazca Ridge subduction will be added, i.e. the uplift of the Fitzcarrald Arch. I might start a Fitzcarrald Arch stub as well, since there is no Wiki page yet.

Just building my reference list, with a useful fact from each source. The article will be up by the end of May.

  • The Fitzcarrald Arch covers 400,000 km2 [1]
  • The Nazca Ridge crust is 18 3 km thick [2]
  • The Nazca Ridge and plate are subducting into the Peru-Chile Trench[3]
  • The Nazca Ridge began forming from the Cretaceous to the Tertiary. The remaining unsubducted portion is Tertiary in age[4]
  • The Nazca Plate subducts at a 30o angle to a depth of 100-120 km, then flattens out and continues to subduct horizontally to a distance 700 km inland[5]
  • Oceanic crust can remain buoyant for up to 40 Ma[6]
  • The Nazca is an aseismic ridge[7]
  • The exposed Nazca Ridge is 200 km wide, >1000 km long, and up to 1.5 km high. 900 km of ridge have subducted already[8]

Peer Review Assignment

Introduction

The Nazca Ridge is a submarine ridge, located on the Nazca Plate off the west coast of South America. This plate is currently subducting under the South American Plate at a convergent boundary known as the Peru-Chile Trench at approximately 7.7 cm yr-1[1]. The Nazca Ridge began subducting obliquely to the collision margin at 11°S, approximately 11.2 Ma, and the current subduction location is 15°S[8]. The ridge is composed of abnormally thick basaltic ocean crust, averaging 18 ±3 km thick[9]. This crust is buoyant, resulting in flat slab subduction under Peru[10]. This flat slab subduction has been associated with the cessation of Andes volcanism and the uplift of the Fitzcarrald Arch on the South American continent approximately 4 Ma[5].

Map of Nazca Ridge in relation to South America.

Morphology

The Nazca Ridge is approximately 200 km wide, 1100 km long, and has 1500 m of bathymetric relief[4].The gradient of the slopes is 1-2°[4]. Based on Rayleigh wave analysis, the ridge has an average crustal thickness of 18 ±3 km[9], but could have a localized maximum thickness up to 35 km[11]. This is abnormally thick for oceanic crust[9], and, at most, the underlying Nazca Plate is only half that thickness[4]. Buoyancy is related to crustal age, and the buoyancy effect can be seen in oceanic crust aged from 30-40 Ma[6]. The Nazca Plate is dated to 45 Ma where it subducts into the Peru-Chile trench[6]. The extreme thickness of the buoyant ridge is responsible for the flat slab subduction of the older underlying plate. The Nazca Ridge is located at a depth of 4000 m below sea level, above the carbonate compensation depth[4]. It is blanketed in a thin covering of 300-400 m thick pelagic calcareous ooze[4].

Formation

The portion of the Nazca Ridge that is currently exposed dates from 31 ± 1 Ma at the Peru-Chile trench, to 23 ± 1 Ma where the Nazca Ridge and Easter Seamount Chain are adjacent, based on basalt ages[3]. Formation began along the Pacific-Farallon/Nazca spreading center[4], and has been attributed to hot spot volcanism. There is some debate as to where this hot spot was originally located however, with locations near Easter Island[12] and Salas y Gomez[3] both being proposed. The ridge is primarily composed of N-MORB basalt, which erupted on the Nazca Plate when the plate was already 5-13 Ma old[3]. Based on isotopic ratios and rare earth element composition, it is estimated that the magma was sourced at approximately 95 km depth from a 7% partial melt[3]. The Nazca Ridge has a conjugate feature on the Pacific Plate, the Tuamotu Plateau[12][8]. Magnetic anomalies have shown that there was symmetrical spreading at the Pacific-Farallon/Nazca center, so the Tuamotu Plateau can be used as a proxy for the pre-subducted Nazca Ridge geometry[8].

Subduction and Migration History

The Nazca Plate began subducting into the Peru-Chile trench 11.2 Ma at 11°S[8]. Due to the oblique orientation of the ridge to the Nazca-South American plate collision zone, the ridge has migrated south along the active margin to its current location at 15°S[8]. Based on Tuamotu Plateau mirror relationship, it is estimated that 900 km of the Nazca Plate has already subducted. The speed of migration has slowed over time, with the ridge traveling at 7.5 cm yr-1 until 10.8 Ma, then slowing to 6.1 cm yr-1 from 10.8-4.9 Ma. The current migration rate is 4.3 cm yr-1[8]. The current subduction rate is 7.7 cm yr-1[1].

Continental Margin Interaction

The ridge is buoyant, resulting in flat slab subduction of the Nazca Plate underneath Peru[10]. Modeling has shown that this type of subduction is only concurrent with

Image showing the location of the Nazca Ridge in relation to South America, and the active volcanic zones

submarine ridges[6], and accounts for approximately 10% of convergent boundaries[10]. The most recent estimate of the subduction angle for the Nazca Plate is 20° to a depth of 24 km at 110 km inland. At 80 km depth, approximately 220km inland, the plate shifts to a horizontal orientation[7], and continues to travel horizontally for up to 700 km inland[5], before resuming subduction into the asthenosphere.

The flat slab subduction associated with the Nazca Ridge has been linked to the cessation of volcanism in the Andes Mountains at about 4 Ma[5]. The subduction has also been linked with the formation of the Fitzcarrald Arch, which is a 400,000 km2, 400-600 m high, domed topographic feature that defines the Amazon drainage Basin[5][5]. Studies indicate that the uplift of the arch also began 4 Ma[5].

Large magnitude earthquakes occur in association with the area around the Nazca Ridge subduction zone, known at the Peru megathrust[13]. These include, but are not limited to, an M 8.1 in 1942, an M 8.0 in 1970, an M 7.7 in 1996, an M 8.4 in 2001[4][7][14], and an M 8.0 in 2007[7][13]. Earthquake records for this area of subduction go back to 1586[14] . All of these ruptures were located either on the coast of Peru or within the Peru-Chile Trench between 9°S and 18°S, coincidental with the subducting Nazca Ridge[7][14], and include both intraplate and interplate rupturing[14]. No large earthquakes have been located between 14°S and 15.5°S, where the bathymetric high of the ridge is subducting, implying the the Nazca Ridge itself is a barrier to ruptures[14]

There has been little geomorphic affect to the Peru-Chile trench due to the ridge subduction beyond a shallowing from 6500 m to 5000 m above the ridge location[4]. With that been said, however, this is a tectonic erosion margin[15][4]. There is no accretionary wedge forming in the trench, and what sediment is found there is from continental sources, based on fossil assemblage[4]. The calcareous ooze blanketing Nazca Ridge is completely subducted[4]. Crustal erosion of the forearc basin has resulted in the loss of 110 km of the South American Plate since 11 Ma[7].

Affects to Amazonia

The uplift of the Fitzcarrald Arch intersects with the Andes Mountains where there is a shift from high-gradient topography to the low-gradient Amazon Basin[1]. This topographic uplift effectively divides the Amazon drainage basin into three sub-basins, the Ucayali to the northwest, the Acre to the northeast, and the Madre De Dios to the southeast[2]. It's hypothesized that significant modifications to sedimentary, erosional, and hydrological processes have resulted from the uplift of the Fitzcarrald Arch. Evolutionary paths for freshwater fish began to diverge in the Amazon sub-basins approximately 4 Ma as well[16]. The uplift of the Fitzcarrald Arch could also be the catalyst that lead to these differing evolutionary paths, effectively isolating fish populations from each other[2].

References

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

  1. ^ a b c d e Regard, V.; Lagnous, R.; Espurt, N.; Darrozes, J.; Baby, P.; Roddaz, M.; Calderon, Y.; Hermoza, W. "Geomorphic evidence for recent uplift of the Fitzcarrald Arch (Peru): A response to the Nazca Ridge subduction". Geomorphology. 107 (3–4): 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.12.003.
  2. ^ a b c d Amazonia--landscape and species evolution : a look into the past. Hoorn, C. (Carina), Wesselingh, F. P. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 2010. ISBN 9781405181136. OCLC 398503454.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  3. ^ a b c d e f Ray, Jyotiranjan S.; Mahoney, John J.; Duncan, Robert A.; Ray, Jyotisankar; Wessel, Paul; Naar, David F. (2012-07-01). "Chronology and Geochemistry of Lavas from the Nazca Ridge and Easter Seamount Chain: an ∼30 Myr Hotspot Record". Journal of Petrology. 53 (7): 1417–1448. doi:10.1093/petrology/egs021. ISSN 0022-3530.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Hampel, Andrea; Kukowski, Nina; Bialas, Joerg; Huebscher, Christian; Heinbockel, Raffaela (2004-02-01). "Ridge subduction at an erosive margin: The collision zone of the Nazca Ridge in southern Peru". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 109 (B2). doi:10.1029/2003jb002593. ISSN 2156-2202.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Espurt, N.; Baby, P.; Brusset, S.; Roddaz, M.; Hermoza, W.; Regard, V.; Antoine, P.-O.; Salas-Gismondi, R.; Bolaños, R. (2007-06-01). "How does the Nazca Ridge subduction influence the modern Amazonian foreland basin?". Geology. 35 (6). doi:10.1130/g23237a.1. ISSN 0091-7613.
  6. ^ a b c d e van Hunen, Jeroen; Berg, Arie P. van den; Vlaar, Nico J. (2002-07-01). "The impact of the South-American plate motion and the Nazca Ridge subduction on the flat subduction below South Peru". Geophysical Research Letters. 29 (14): 35–1–35-4. doi:10.1029/2001gl014004. ISSN 1944-8007.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Kim, YoungHee; Clayton, Robert W. (2015). "Seismic properties of the Nazca oceanic crust in the southern Peruvian subduction system". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 429: 110–121 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h Hampel, Andrea (2002). "The migration history of the Nazca Ridge along the Peruvian active margin: a re-evaluation". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 203: 665–679 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  9. ^ a b c Woods, T.M.; Okal, E.A. (1994). "The structure of the Nazca Ridge and the Sala y Gomez seamount chain from dispersion of Rayleigh waves". Geophysical Journal International. 117: 205–222. {{cite journal}}: line feed character in |journal= at position 13 (help)
  10. ^ a b c Gutscher, M.A.; Spakman, W.; Bijwaard, H.; Engdalh, E.R. (2000). "Geodynamics of flat subduction: Seismicity and tomographic constraints from th Andean margin". Tectonics. 19: 814–833.
  11. ^ Tassara, Andrés; Götze, Hans-Jürgen; Schmidt, Sabine; Hackney, Ron (2006). "Three-dimensional density model of the Nazca plate and the Andean continental margin". Journal of Geophysical Research. 111 (B9). doi:10.1029/2005jb003976. ISSN 0148-0227.
  12. ^ a b Pilger, R.H.; Handschumacher, D.W. (1981). "The fixed hotspot hypothesis and origin of the Easter-Salas y Gomez-Nazca trace". Geological Society of America Bulletin. 92: 437–446.
  13. ^ a b Sufri, Oner; Koper, Keith D.; Lay, Thorne (2012-04). "Along-dip seismic radiation segmentation during the 2007 Mw8.0 Pisco, Peru earthquake". Geophysical Research Letters. 39 (8): n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2012gl051316. ISSN 0094-8276. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  14. ^ a b c d e Beck, Susan L.; Ruff, Larry J. (November 1989). "Great earthquakes and subduction along the Peru trench". Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 57 (3–4): 199–224. doi:10.1016/0031-9201(89)90112-x. ISSN 0031-9201.
  15. ^ Clift, Peter D.; Pecher, Ingo; Kukowski, Nina; Hampel, Andrea (2003-06). "Tectonic erosion of the Peruvian forearc, Lima Basin, by subduction and Nazca Ridge collision". Tectonics. 22 (3): n/a–n/a. doi:10.1029/2002tc001386. ISSN 0278-7407. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  16. ^ HUBERT, NICOLAS; DUPONCHELLE, FABRICE; NUÑEZ, JESUS; GARCIA-DAVILA, CARMEN; PAUGY, DIDIER; RENNO, JEAN-FRANÇOIS (2007-05). "Phylogeography of the piranha genera Serrasalmus and Pygocentrus: implications for the diversification of the Neotropical ichthyofauna". Molecular Ecology. 16 (10): 2115–2136. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03267.x. ISSN 0962-1083. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:ErraticGeologist/sandbox&oldid=841233507"