Jump to content

Talk:Pink (singer): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
{{annual readership}}
m adding VA template
Line 34: Line 34:
}}
}}
{{annual readership}}
{{annual readership}}
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Musicians|class=C}}


== Children ==
== Children ==

Revision as of 14:30, 21 May 2018

Former good article nomineePink (singer) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 31, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

Template:Vital article

Children

Per WP:BLPNAMES, The names of any immediate, ex, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject.. Since the children's names are actually in the reference titles, and will be showing up at the bottom of the article anyway, I don't see any reason not to include them in the text. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of our readers don't bother looking at the references, which is why I thought to remove the names of non-notable minor children. Binksternet (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I do see your point, and might agree with you if we weren't putting the names in the article anyway, but as things stand... can you find reliable sources for the info that don't include the names in the titles? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just adding my 2c ..... Without sounding disrespectful it's not our position to "protect her children" - She's plastered their names everywhere so all's we're doing is confirming what's already out there, Ofcourse had this been a case of 1 reference citing their names then yeah MINOR would and should be followed however in this case it's multiple sources and Pink herself has named them on Twitter (Example 1 Example 2 so I personally don't see the harm in following suit. –Davey2010Talk 00:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stylization

Isn't her name stylized as P!NK, not as P!nk? ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 03:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

She uses both styles, as shown here. WWGB (talk) 11:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2018

Wikify Beat Bugs 198.81.129.207 (talk) 18:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done  Ivecos (t) 18:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]