User talk:Arsenal666: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:53, 28 October 2006

your edit to Thierry Henry

please STOP making the SAME OLD ridiculous mistake of updating the infobox WRONGLY. the appearances are for DOMESTIC games only, so too for GOALS. if you even bother to look at the stats table properly, changing it to what you had MAKES NO SENSE. please DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AGAIN. Chensiyuan 12:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thierry Henry Edit

that edit was right AND i REGULARLY check the Stats so go berate someone else YOU PEDANTIC FREAK

Image copyright problem with Image:Small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop uploading unlicensed images

Please stop. All your edits will be reverted. Images must have source and licence information.

And please do not edit appearances and goals for players unless they are league only. Thank you. Budgiekiller 11:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whateva all this "unlicensed images" hassle is crap.Nobody cares and most of mine are a masterpiece of websearching.Piss off — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenal666 (talk • contribs)

Actually, it isn't 'crap', it's policy. I would advise you to familiarise yourself with the copyright policies of Wikipedia. There are plenty of links here now for you to choose from. Remember, every image you upload without such information will be deleted within seven days, and every edit you make to include such images will be reverted. Cheers! Budgiekiller 11:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Julio cesar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Julio cesar.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Budgiekiller 11:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Henry speed.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Henry speed.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Budgiekiller 11:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Henry brazil.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Henry brazil.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Budgiekiller 11:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:France players.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:France players.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Budgiekiller 11:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Henry speed1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Henry speed1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned

Okay, since you studiously ignore these warnings, the next time you make an edit in a similar way, it will be considered vandalism, and eventually your account will be blocked. Cheers! Budgiekiller 15:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about changing the appearances for Thierry Henry from league-only (which is required) to all appearances. Does that help clarify the situation? Budgiekiller 15:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

WHICH edit?You have to admit my pictures are good.ANYWAY, WHO'S GOING TO KNOW IF YOU USE A FEW PICTURES LIKE MINE?WHY WOULD THEY CARE?

Edit

Oh right.So you want to list his appearances & goals FOR ARSENAL as those in the premier league?IT SHOULD BE ALL FIRST-CLASS APPEARANCES.YOU CAN'T CALL THAT VANDALISM

No, it is vandalism if you persist in making edits contrary to warnings - look at the bottom of the infobox you're editing - it says "Professional club appearances and goals counted for the domestic league only " - DOMESTIC LEAGUE ONLY being the pertinent phrase. Okay? Cheers! Budgiekiller 16:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK

Fine, but that's pretty close to discrediting him.

Glad you agree. Cheers! Budgiekiller 16:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Arsenal players.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arsenal players.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Budgiekiller 16:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: That photo of the milky way

> You can't expect to believe you photographed THAT

If you're implying I didn't take that photograph, you're wrong. The information on the image page is accurate. -- Moondigger 17:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

If you say so

Try being a bit more courteous to fellow editors! Cheers! Budgiekiller 08:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right

Hey wait a minute.How do YOU know? STOP FOLLOWING ME!

I assure you, I'm not following you, I am just monitoring your edits. Budgiekiller 13:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHY are you monitoring my edits?

Because you've uploaded several images without source/licence information against advice, and made changes to articles to use said images against advice and changed Henry's stats twice against advice. This could be considered vandalism. I'm just checking no more pages become problematic. Budgiekiller 13:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK

When you put an image on an article, how do you fram it and put text explaining what it is?

Image tagging for Image:Eva longoria1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eva longoria1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've given it now, happy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenal666 (talk • contribs)

Unless the photographer allows his work to be published freely, it is most likely copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia. --Madchester 15:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jessica alba.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessica alba.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Madchester 15:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Open content"

Please stop labeling your uploaded photos as "open content", when they simply do not qualify for that license. Thanks. --Madchester 15:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they do!

Oct. 28

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing.

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --Madchester 16:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What ARE you talking about?

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Madchester 16:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arsenal666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only remove Licensing Tags when I have given information about the author, source, licensing and copyright tag. I don't see why it should remain after I've given my information since I think it means that even if I provide that information it may still delete my photos, which I think are rather good.I hope you agree.

Decline reason:

The copyright tags you added show you have no clue how copyright works or what free content means, it doesn't matter that the images are good looking you can't claim that they are free content unless you can prove that the photographer have explicitly released them under such a license, simply pasting "open source" on everyting you upload does not qualify as providing copyright info. Please take this oppotunity to read and understand Wikipedia:Copyrights, Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Fair use and be more carefull with uploads after you block have expired. -- Sherool (talk) 16:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Image copyright problem with Image:Eva longoria2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eva longoria2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Madchester 16:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 141: / Line 141: @@
 {{block|removing "no license" tag from personally uploaded images, disregard for image licensing rules despite warnings from numerous editors}} --[[User:Madchester|Madchester]] 16:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
-{{unblock|I only remove Licensing Tags when I have given information about the author, source, licensing and copyright tag. I don't see why it should remain after I've given my information since I think it means that even if I provide that information it may still delete my photos, which I think are rather good.I hope you agree.}}
+{{unblock reviewed|I only remove Licensing Tags when I have given information about the author, source, licensing and copyright tag. I don't see why it should remain after I've given my information since I think it means that even if I provide that information it may still delete my photos, which I think are rather good.I hope you agree.|decline=The copyright tags you added show you have no clue how copyright works or what [[free content]] means, it doesn't matter that the images are good looking you can't claim that they are free content unless you can prove that the photographer have explicitly released them under such a license, simply pasting "open source" on everyting you upload does '''not''' qualify as providing copyright info. Please take this oppotunity to read and understand [[Wikipedia:Copyrights]], [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]] and [[Wikipedia:Fair use]] and be more carefull with uploads after you block have expired. -- [[User:Sherool|Sherool]] <span style="font-size:75%">[[User talk:Sherool|(talk)]]</span> 16:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)}}
 ==Image copyright problem with Image:Eva longoria2.jpg==