User talk:Quek157

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

I will not contest the indef, I am in fact looking for a way to stop myself from contributing here. I had created articles such as People's Park Centre, Sun Plaza (Singapore), Sembawang Shopping Centre, Bedok Point, Sungei Simpang Kiri, all Single handedly. I had expanded Canberra MRT station as my mainspace works. I didn't list those on my user page. In addition, I had participated in AFD and my record now stands at in excess of 90% match using the snortywong tool with 126 pages !Voted, I didn't know that was not understanding AFD rationales. I did 130+ CSD this month alone and seeing my CSD log, it's almost all red except for some. I really shouldn't have returned to WIkipedia English. In good faith, I tried to improve, add onto Singapore, and other countries articles (Such as South Korea). My mainspace contributions all have edit summaries and I did not revert unnecessarily. Just one moment of mistake (or just several mistake) is enough to cause the AN/I and hostility. This is the last straw about why I did posted retirement. Initially, wikibreak is enough or to mainspace, but clearly this is not the Wikipedia I envisioned over in 2007. I will not bother to contribute any further with such hostility and trying to take any user down with warnings. This is not collaboraton. This will be the very last post here. Please do not delete this and one more good standing Singaporean Wikipedian down. I will continue on and am glad with the end of this stressful return. And I hope no one else will add anything below this notice, this is my last request. Also I will hope this talkpage is permanently protected as well as I don't mind "cannot edit talkpage". For those I had helping in AFC, sorry I can't but good guidances are found in the notes on that page. For those who worked with me, I thank all of you. Washing my hands here!--Quek157 (talk) 09:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

update:seen the AN. I am not going to care with any restricted editing. Why subject myself to all these. CIR I agree, education is needed only. AFD nomination one wrongly will lead to these. I cannot fathom. never mind, forgive and forget. I find verbose arguments from some , I heard you already, no use keep on pulling all the points. Treating someone poorly and then wanting people to contribute, it's hard. no backend work with only front-end, is like paying income taxes without the right to vote. At the very most it is a CIR block 1 month not indef but seeing how immature people are and this absolute lack of collaboration which is here, I rather it being indef. I totally agree this block is unwarranted and thanks for much to speak up for me the few, this will lead to the downfall of any projects. I sincerely hope the community can get standards up together and return to a collaborative style of Wikipedia or else this will fall. Delete this or not you may please, but don't be a frog in burning waters that is too late. I'm an admin somewhere else with comparable workload also, admins are just mops. I block people, I ban people too for advertising and disruption and many appealed by messaging me, and I absolutely hate it as my mind is set and in my perception, the threshold was reach. typically I reject such appeals. Different here is that these are peoples I will meet real life and I will have to face them face to face, so I had to be careful with statements. Reciprocally, I'll not be here appealing. Don't need, if you don't want me to be here, I don't linger around. wish this project the best. A war zone and place without equal standards, no way I stay Quek157 (talk) 08:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Quek157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

hi, just to end the entire facare, sorry for adding retirement tags I'm proposing this. 1 year topic ban from nominating deletion any kind. afd restricted to voting with policies, e.g no per norm. 1 year topic ban on all namespaces except mainspace user Wikipedia projects and etc. 6 months no AFC reviews . Indef topic ban from AN. broadly constructed. For your consideration if against any then indef based on not here. no deletion of talk page . Thanks Quek157 (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=hi, just to end the entire facare, sorry for adding retirement tags I'm proposing this. 1 year topic ban from nominating deletion any kind. afd restricted to voting with policies, e.g no per norm. 1 year topic ban on all namespaces except mainspace user Wikipedia projects and etc. 6 months no AFC reviews . Indef topic ban from AN. broadly constructed. For your consideration if against any then indef based on not here. no deletion of talk page . Thanks [[User:Quek157|Quek157]] ([[User talk:Quek157#top|talk]]) 00:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=hi, just to end the entire facare, sorry for adding retirement tags I'm proposing this. 1 year topic ban from nominating deletion any kind. afd restricted to voting with policies, e.g no per norm. 1 year topic ban on all namespaces except mainspace user Wikipedia projects and etc. 6 months no AFC reviews . Indef topic ban from AN. broadly constructed. For your consideration if against any then indef based on not here. no deletion of talk page . Thanks [[User:Quek157|Quek157]] ([[User talk:Quek157#top|talk]]) 00:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=hi, just to end the entire facare, sorry for adding retirement tags I'm proposing this. 1 year topic ban from nominating deletion any kind. afd restricted to voting with policies, e.g no per norm. 1 year topic ban on all namespaces except mainspace user Wikipedia projects and etc. 6 months no AFC reviews . Indef topic ban from AN. broadly constructed. For your consideration if against any then indef based on not here. no deletion of talk page . Thanks [[User:Quek157|Quek157]] ([[User talk:Quek157#top|talk]]) 00:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

.