Talk:Trade in Services Agreement: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Trade in Services Agreement/Archives/2015. (BOT) |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Trade in Services Agreement/Archives/2015. (BOT) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Trade in Services Agreement/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Trade in Services Agreement/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
== Radical interpretation == |
|||
This seems like a radical interpretation of the text |
|||
::The agreement bans government mandates for use of open source software, stating "No Party may require the transfer of, or access to, source code of software owned by a person of another Party, as a condition of providing services related to such software in its territory."[12] The open source word processing application LibreOffice has been deployed by many local governments throughout the EU to save money.[13][14][15][16] |
|||
It seems more likely it says that they cannot compel the source code from closed sourced initiative in exchange (quid pro quo) for "providing services related to such software". And this one example, which has source code that is already out (and needs not be compelled) doe not require *four* references. |
|||
Thoughts? Kassorlae 16:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Source code of software == |
== Source code of software == |
Revision as of 12:20, 4 June 2018
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Source code of software
This part of the text:
- "The open source word processing application LibreOffice has been deployed by many local governments throughout the EU to save money"
Cutting costs is unrelated to the rest of the section on open source software. Although some of the links are relevant. I edited the section accordingly. --Rougieux (talk) 14:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Start-Class European Union articles
- Low-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- Start-Class Trade articles
- Mid-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles