Jump to content

Talk:Liza Koshy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Infobox: reply
Infobox: continue to omit
Line 29: Line 29:
::::::Would <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Infobox YouTube personality]]}} be more appropriate? Although it states she is an actress, I believe her Youtube career should be first. I think that is what she is mainly known for, unless I'm wrong. [[User:Callmemirela|<span style="font-family:Playfair Display; color:#caa2ac">Callmemirela</span>]] &#127809; <sup>[[User talk:Callmemirela|<b style="font-family:Open Sans; color:#9cadad; text-transform:uppercase;">talk</b>]]</sup> 19:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::Would <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Infobox YouTube personality]]}} be more appropriate? Although it states she is an actress, I believe her Youtube career should be first. I think that is what she is mainly known for, unless I'm wrong. [[User:Callmemirela|<span style="font-family:Playfair Display; color:#caa2ac">Callmemirela</span>]] &#127809; <sup>[[User talk:Callmemirela|<b style="font-family:Open Sans; color:#9cadad; text-transform:uppercase;">talk</b>]]</sup> 19:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::::I believe that any infobox in this article would be not only redundant, but misleading. -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::::I believe that any infobox in this article would be not only redundant, but misleading. -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

::::::::An info-box would be mere clutter and duplication. Stick with the existing consensus to omit such a thing. They can be useful in some articles, but not here. '''<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size:1.05em;">[[User:Tim riley|<font color="#0A0A2A">Tim riley</font>]][[User talk:Tim riley|<font color="#848484"> talk</font>]]</span>''' 20:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:06, 6 June 2018

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2018

I would like to change her picture, it is absolutly horrible, it is an unflateriing angle, think you

                                                       -Gabbie Hanna Gabbie Hanna (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: If you would like to change the photo, then please give a replacement. st170e 16:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I noticed the infobox was missing. I could've sworn this article had, so I checked the discussion in the archive. Is the infobox not there because of the discussion? Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 03:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no WP:CONSENSUS to include an infobox in this article. If you look at that archived discussion, you will see many reasons not to include one in this article. See WP:INFOBOXUSE. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted your edit. It is astonishing that you would do that without first establishing a consensus to add the box. Here is the archived discussion referenced above so that other editors can easily find it. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus for an infobox here and it is not required. Jack1956 (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's absolutely silly to need consensus for an infobox to be included, but I'm not about to start an edit war, so here we are to discuss it. I think it should be added for multiple reasons, notably the birthdate and age template and years active fields, which are not available at a glance. I understand previous discussion has shown some users consider Infoboxes to be unnecessary (something I completely disagree with) because it contains info that's already in the lead of the article. RF23 (talk) 08:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No infobox for the reason put so eloquently above by RF23 at the end of their comment. Jack1956 (talk) 15:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Callmemirela: Removed with this edit about a month ago. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And ping @Ringerfan23:. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would {{Template:Infobox YouTube personality}} be more appropriate? Although it states she is an actress, I believe her Youtube career should be first. I think that is what she is mainly known for, unless I'm wrong. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 19:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that any infobox in this article would be not only redundant, but misleading. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An info-box would be mere clutter and duplication. Stick with the existing consensus to omit such a thing. They can be useful in some articles, but not here. Tim riley talk 20:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]