Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Visual arts/Selected quote/8: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Portal:Visual arts/Selected quote/8: strong keep |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: Nonsense. See [[Wikipedia:Offensive material]] {{tq|... should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available}} I do take your point about micromanaging a portal. I'll take it to the project to see if we can find something better. Request for deletion withdrawn. [[User:Vexations|Vexations]] ([[User talk:Vexations|talk]]) 12:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
: Nonsense. See [[Wikipedia:Offensive material]] {{tq|... should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available}} I do take your point about micromanaging a portal. I'll take it to the project to see if we can find something better. Request for deletion withdrawn. [[User:Vexations|Vexations]] ([[User talk:Vexations|talk]]) 12:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
||
:: Come back if they are not receptive. —[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 13:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
:: Come back if they are not receptive. —[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 13:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong keep''' per [[WP:NOTCENSORED]]. If [[Renoir]] in fact said that (a source would not come amiss) hen we should have it as helping to illuminate the attitudes of very well-noted artists to their subject matter. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 21:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:07, 16 June 2018
Offensive and unsourced. Can we please NOT have this in our " doorway into Wikipedia's coverage on art"? Vexations (talk) 02:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NOTCENSORED. A fan of pop art might find Portal:Visual arts/Selected quote/9 equally offensive but that would not be grounds to remove it either. Appropriate grounds for deletion are e.g. if the quote is arcane or by an artist who is barely relevant. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:33, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Portal talk:Visual arts has been notified of this discussion. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. This is an out-of-scope attempt to micromanage a portal. Weird stuff is ok in the visual arts. This quote is weird. I recommend to them that they achieve it due to failure of verifiability. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Nonsense. See Wikipedia:Offensive material
... should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available
I do take your point about micromanaging a portal. I'll take it to the project to see if we can find something better. Request for deletion withdrawn. Vexations (talk) 12:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)- Come back if they are not receptive. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep per WP:NOTCENSORED. If Renoir in fact said that (a source would not come amiss) hen we should have it as helping to illuminate the attitudes of very well-noted artists to their subject matter. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)