Jump to content

Talk:Gary Ridgway: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 12: Line 12:
== DNA? ==
== DNA? ==
Okay where it says, "The DNA samples collected in 1987 were later subjected to a DNA analysis," I feel that is incorrect. In 1987 they would not have collected "DNA samples" since we didn't have that technology then. Simply, "The samples collected in 1987 were later subjected to a DNA analysis," would suffice. That said, I'm changing it. If I'm wrong, fine. Just please provide a source that states the samples taken were for DNA as the sentence implies. [[User:Magnoliasouth|MagnoliaSouth]] <small><sup>([[User_talk:Magnoliasouth|talk]])</sup></small> 22:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Okay where it says, "The DNA samples collected in 1987 were later subjected to a DNA analysis," I feel that is incorrect. In 1987 they would not have collected "DNA samples" since we didn't have that technology then. Simply, "The samples collected in 1987 were later subjected to a DNA analysis," would suffice. That said, I'm changing it. If I'm wrong, fine. Just please provide a source that states the samples taken were for DNA as the sentence implies. [[User:Magnoliasouth|MagnoliaSouth]] <small><sup>([[User_talk:Magnoliasouth|talk]])</sup></small> 22:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
:Either would work. DNA analysis was used for the first time to convict a suspect (AND exonerate an innocent man) in 1987. I think that even if the technology was not developed, the task force knew what they were doing when they collected the sample. Ridgway could have been nailed much earlier if there was not such a backlog in the crime lab testing facility. Even then, the evidence was circumstantial - his DNA was there because he had sex with those prostitutes. So did others. It is the nature of the "profession". [[Special:Contributions/47.137.185.148|47.137.185.148]] ([[User talk:47.137.185.148|talk]]) 03:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


== [[Silence of the Lambs]] ==
== [[Silence of the Lambs]] ==

Revision as of 03:24, 17 June 2018

Template:Vital article

DNA?

Okay where it says, "The DNA samples collected in 1987 were later subjected to a DNA analysis," I feel that is incorrect. In 1987 they would not have collected "DNA samples" since we didn't have that technology then. Simply, "The samples collected in 1987 were later subjected to a DNA analysis," would suffice. That said, I'm changing it. If I'm wrong, fine. Just please provide a source that states the samples taken were for DNA as the sentence implies. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 22:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either would work. DNA analysis was used for the first time to convict a suspect (AND exonerate an innocent man) in 1987. I think that even if the technology was not developed, the task force knew what they were doing when they collected the sample. Ridgway could have been nailed much earlier if there was not such a backlog in the crime lab testing facility. Even then, the evidence was circumstantial - his DNA was there because he had sex with those prostitutes. So did others. It is the nature of the "profession". 47.137.185.148 (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Silence of the Lambs

86.18.80.97 (talk) 16:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC) Should this article mention the fact that he is an inspiration for buffalo bill in silence of the lambs?[reply]

I've never heard that he (rather The Green River Killer, as Ridgway was identified long after the novel and film came out) was a direct inspiration for the Buffalo Bill character - do you have a source? Gein was an inspiration for the flesh suit aspect (and Lecter's cannibalism), and Bundy was an inspiration for at least two things: feigning injury to abduct Catherine Martin, and consulting with him in order to catch another serial killer. In Bundy's case, the killer they were seeking his advice on was the Green River Killer, but that would be more of an inspiration for Lecter's character. If you can find a good source on this it should be added. Doc talk 17:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture request

It's a bit odd that the article for Americans most prolific serial killer doesn't have a single image. 202.171.168.178 (talk) 12:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was one here, and I'll look into it: but dealing with WP:FU images will burn you out quickly. Doc talk 12:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add to lead ranking

I think we should add he is the most prolific American serial killer to the lead. or something interesting like that. Cuz 49 is a lot of people. And I thought they said serial killers do not hunt outside of their ethnic group?--Inayity (talk) 14:46, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DNA prior to 1995

There are many police departments that correctly preserved DNA prior to 1995. It's actually how they're currently able to solve cold cases.

Ted Bundy and Rodney Alcala are both believed to have murdered over 100 females. Bundy and Alcala were also more intelligent than Ridgway. If they had the DNA testing back when Ridgway was killing that we have today, he would have been caught early on. 108.31.41.5 (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.31.41.5 (talk) 09:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First Wife

The article says:

At age 21, after graduating from high school, Ridgway married his high school girlfriend Marcia Winslow. ... the marriage ended within a year.

yet this person is not named in the list of spouses. (Or she may be under a different name, but this is undocumented.) Co149 (talk) 01:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected victim

An anonymous poster indicated two years ago that Ridgeway was ruled out as the murderer of Rose Marie Kurran, A.K.A. "Curran." I'm unable to find any such reference, despite an extensive search for a source. Activist (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gary Ridgway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gary Ridgway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gary Ridgway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Airway Heights

The article stated: "Roughly around 2005, Ridgway made more pleas with the Federal government and was transferred to Airway Heights where he was put in a minimum-medium security tank." I have removed this entry for a number of reasons:

  • Airway Heights Corrections Center is a corrections centre that has a maximum security section, I cannot believe that his security status would be changed. Allegedly he was sent to Colorado for financial reasons, but also so he could be evaluated independantly. It was feared that he would be at risk if he remained in Washington State. His security status was as much for his own protection as part of his incarceration.
  • The statement is not referenced
  • The statement cannot be corroberated by reliable sources (most reference Wikipedia)
  • This statement seems to be in contradiction of reliable sources, such as the references in the article, where it is stated that he was transferred from Walla Walla.

192.168.2.17 11:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Gary Ridgway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas

47.137.185.148: I have no particular problem with your last edit, but in response to your edit summary: If you again remove a link from this or another article as "dead" without even attempting to find an archived copy of the URL at archive.org, I will indeed revert it (without discussion on the Talk page). Also, it sounds as if you may be relying on original research rather than published sources for at least some of your edits, and are strongly cautioned about doing so. General Ization Talk 03:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gary_Ridgway&oldid=846205293"