User talk:Hwood777

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm ♠ 20:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hwood777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i did not know i was required to answer a question someone asked of me, i know now Hwood777 (talk) 20:33, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were also blocked for refusing to cite your additions, but forgot to address that in your request. Yamla (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Also, how can you claim you "didn't know you were required"? You were clearly told on May 20 that "It is also Wikipedia policy that you have to respond", with an attached link to WP:Communication is required, and you were told again on June 8 that "Communication is mandatory". In spite of this, you responded to the sixth attempt to communicate with you by blanking your page. If you really didn't know, then it is a competence issue, because there should be no reason whatsoever that you didn't know. Please just own up to your wrongdoings, rather than lying, and we can actually consider unblocking you. See WP:GAB for instructions. Swarm ♠ 21:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Hwood777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes i was asked to respond and i ignored it. going forward i will use sources and respond to all requests thank you for understanding and guiding me in the ways of wikipedia. please consider me for unblocking Hwood777 (talk) 22:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yes i was asked to respond and i ignored it. going forward i will use sources and respond to all requests thank you for understanding and guiding me in the ways of wikipedia. please consider me for unblocking [[User:Hwood777|Hwood777]] ([[User talk:Hwood777#top|talk]]) 22:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes i was asked to respond and i ignored it. going forward i will use sources and respond to all requests thank you for understanding and guiding me in the ways of wikipedia. please consider me for unblocking [[User:Hwood777|Hwood777]] ([[User talk:Hwood777#top|talk]]) 22:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes i was asked to respond and i ignored it. going forward i will use sources and respond to all requests thank you for understanding and guiding me in the ways of wikipedia. please consider me for unblocking [[User:Hwood777|Hwood777]] ([[User talk:Hwood777#top|talk]]) 22:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

link to removed talk page discussion and unblock discussion

It was certainly hard to make heads or tails of this. I'm putting a link here to the revision before the mass removal to ease the ascertaining of context. I would be willing to unblock, but don't want to rush into anything. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

thank you for considering to unblock. Hwood777 (talk) 14:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

would you please consider me for unblock? I understand what i did was not following the rules of editing and will not ignore requests in the future User talk:Swarm Hwood777 (talk) 13:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)