Talk:Hayley Kiyoko: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:37, 24 June 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hayley Kiyoko article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Women Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled

It looks like the Notability fairy has been on this article too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.65.209 (talk) 01:09, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled 2

The career section is a little weird. It would make more sense for it to be distributed by music/acting rather than by years. Her new movie XOXO should also be added to this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rezuschlag (talk • contribs) 00:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image change

Image changing due to the past nature of the last photo, where she appeared almost unrecognizable compared to the way she looks now. Anonpediann (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a much better image, but is the licensing correct? Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately, it isn't. There are two claims for the image:

The first states that the article is about the work, that is the image. If, for example, we have an article about a photograph we can use a low-res version of the copyrighted image under fair use. This article is about Kiyoko, not the photo of her.

The second claim is that the image is not replaceable: For example, if Kiyoko were dead or a recluse, we can't really get a free image of her. In this case, she is a living person and we therefore assume (in all but the most extreme cases) that someone could reasonably take a photo of her.

I have reverted the change. The current image, while perhaps dated, is free. Until we find a copyright free image we are stuck with what we have. - SummerPhD^v2.0 23:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that to be the case. My knowledge of image licensing (as shown elsewhere) is limited, so thought I'd defer to another. Shame though - the OP is correct in that she looks very different now. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New photo

Atlantic Records released a press kit of Hayley Kiyoko, with 3 images. I believe press kit photos are based in fair use, they are uploaded with that purpose. You know more about promotional press kit photo use? Thanks. Anonpediann (talk) 13:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hayley Kiyoko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New picture

The picture for her wikipedia page really needs to change because this one is quite old and Hayley Kiyoko looks very different now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14D:5491:8850:B582:56E1:B1F3:E9C (talk) 01:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"identifies as a gay woman"

There have been a number of different wordings bounced around here. You are welcome to your opinions of what you feels she "should" say or how she "should" identify or what would be simpler or more direct. Your opinion does not belong here.

In the source, Kiyoko self-identifies as a "gay woman". Please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Vocabulary. If you do not agree, please discuss the issue here. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why but.. whenever there is a page on Wikipedia that uses terms like "Gay woman" I feel like it's politically WRONG because I think that gay is the term for men and when it's used for women my mind can't comprehend it. So yeah! Emiship'05 (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:59, 2 June 2018 edit SummerPhDv2.0 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 78,669 edits →"identifies as a gay woman": new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:37, 24 June 2018 edit undo Emiship'05 (talk \| contribs) 86 edits No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 48:		Line 48:

	In the source, Kiyoko self-identifies as a "gay woman". Please see [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Vocabulary]]. If you do not agree, please discuss the issue here. - <span style="color:#D70270;background-color:white;">Sum</span><span style="color:#734F96;background-color:white;">mer</span><span style="color:#0038A8;background-color:white;">PhD</span><sup>[[User talk:SummerPhDv2.0\|v2.0]]</sup> 16:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)		In the source, Kiyoko self-identifies as a "gay woman". Please see [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Vocabulary]]. If you do not agree, please discuss the issue here. - <span style="color:#D70270;background-color:white;">Sum</span><span style="color:#734F96;background-color:white;">mer</span><span style="color:#0038A8;background-color:white;">PhD</span><sup>[[User talk:SummerPhDv2.0\|v2.0]]</sup> 16:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

			I don't know why but.. whenever there is a page on Wikipedia that uses terms like "Gay woman" I feel like it's politically WRONG because I think that gay is the term for men and when it's used for women my mind can't comprehend it. So yeah! [[User:Emiship'05\|Emiship'05]] ([[User talk:Emiship'05\|talk]]) 14:37, 24 June 2018 (UTC)