Wikipedia:Help desk

Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)

• For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
• Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
• If your question is about a Wikipedia article, draft article, or other page on Wikipedia, tell us what it is!
• Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
• For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
• New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners (but please don't ask in both places).

Ask a question

June 23

Locked page has been vandalized

There is a locked page on Wikipedia that was vandalized before it was locked. It now has a blatant error that I cannot correct. How do I request a correction? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asinoski9595 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Asinoski9595: You can use the template {{Edit request}} on the article's talk page, or if you let us know what page (and the error) here, we can take care of it. LittlePuppers (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict)@Asinoski9595: It can depend on the level of protection. When you click 'edit source', do you see a pink notice with details of the protection? Does that give any instructions for requesting an edit? However, if you return here with more details, one of the volunteers will likely have the necessary permission. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: The following copied from the heelp desk talk page. Eagleash (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi! I’d like to request an edit for the page for Emma Swan, character from Once Upon a Time. Her daughter’s name is Hope Swan-Jones (as seen on the pages for other Once Upon a Time characters). Someone changed it to Hope Swan-Mills. I can’t edit it because the page is locked, and i’m a new reviewer. I also believe the person who vandalized the page removed a great deal of the description section that discussed her relationship with her husband, Killian Jones (aka Captain Hook). Is there a way to restore that portion of the description? Thanks! Asinoski9595 (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Asinoski9595: It seems the 'error' has already been corrected. The person that did so also disrupted tte protection template... maybe in good faith not certain, but please keep an eye on the page and if you spot anything else, let us know. Thank you for bringing this here. Eagleash (talk) 17:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Footnote in question

A known commentator X is quoted in an article, about a fact involving Y, the subject of the article: “X says that, ‘Y has violated a federal criminal law’”.The cite is given for that quote. Is it permissible to add another cite, to the only federal law which is relevant, even though the commentator did not cite the specific law? Thanks so much. Hoppyh (talk) 21:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Seems to me that this constitutes original research, which we do not accept. It may seem clear to you that this is "the only federal law which is relevant, even though the commentator did not cite the specific law"; but unless a reliable source says so, it's just your opinion. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Makes sense—I should have seen this—the learning never stops. You all do a great job here. Hoppyh (talk) 02:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please, take a look

To patrollers and administrators,

Please, take a look at File:Danish Order of Freemasons (Den Danske Frimurerorden) - logo.png#Licensing:

"To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an 'appropriate' rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template."

If the rationale is okay, please mark it so. --PetersenAndersen (talk) 21:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Wrong DOB

A wiki page about me lists wrong date of my birth - making me almost 10 years older! This is a serious distortion. (no woman would like this and as an active scholar, this matters to me a great deal). This info comes not inside my wiki page but on the announcement page, when I google my name. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.196.120 (talk) 22:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

If you have a problem with the Google Knowledge Graph then you're going to have to talk to them about it. We have no control over Google. Wikipedia is completely separate and Google pulls that information from a large quantity of different websites. There should be a feedback link at the bottom of the chart on Google that you can use. --Majora (talk) 22:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Yes, I kind of thought so but was not sure, you are awesome, very quick response, you rock! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.196.120 (talk) 22:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

• While we do not know Google's algorithm, there is at least a chance that they would trust Wikipedia more than other sites. On the off chance that this is so, you might want to provide us with a reliable source for you DOB. NOTE: we have our own peculiar definition for "reliable source". Please see WP:RS. put your DOB and a reference to the reliable source on the article's talk page, together with the magic incantation {{request edit}} (with the curly braces) and someone will come along and update the article. -Arch dude (talk) 23:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not naming you and the claimed age here but based on the first edit at Special:Contributions/173.54.196.120 I guess you are the subject of wikidata:Q4767509. That page is not part of Wikipedia but it is a sister project of us. It's possible Google got the year from there since the Google Knowledge Graph claims the same year as Wikidata. It was added [1] by Magnus Manske and his bot 25 May 2018 with a reference [2] where I don't currently see a birth year. The Wikipedia article has no birth year. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

While I still stand by my original response, that the person should contact Google, for good measure I removed the DOB from wikidata since it was improperly sourced. --Majora (talk) 23:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

June 24

This title is blacklisted

Hi

I am writing an article about a flower tea. When I finished my article and tried to get it published, it said: "this article's title is blacklisted". What should I do to solve this problem? I have tried some other titles too, but it remains the same result. Or where can I check which titles are blacklisted?

Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScrubNurseBKK (talk • contribs) 02:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

What was the title? Ian.thomson (talk) 02:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

ScrubNurseBKK, this question is the only contribution made by your current account. I'm assuming this is work done before you registered at Wikipedia? We have a spam blacklist at WP:BLACKLIST, but it's in regards to external links. When an article has been repeatedly deleted, we may sometimes "salt" the name to prevent it ever being created again. To answer your specific question, the list you're requesting is here (warning: it is not alphabetic), but it seems unlikely that a particular kind of tea would make the list. We can be more helpful once you give us the title of the article you're trying to create. Matt Deres (talk) 03:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

pencil icon

Hi: On the page where there is a list of options at the top including logout, preferences, sandbox and my handle, there is an image of what might be a pencil. When I mouse-over, an message comes up that says WiEd and some number and a date followed by a statement that clicking will disable it. What is this all about?Kdammers (talk) 10:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

It says wikEd and a version number. See User:Cacycle/wikEd. You must have enabled wikEd at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets. When it's enabled in preferences, it can quickly be enabled and disabled during editing on that icon without having to change preferences. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Module move

Can someone tell me how to move a module with a rediect, thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 13:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

You can't, not in the same way that you might move a template or an article and leave a redirect behind. If you must move a module and must retain the old name then move the module to the new name and then, at the old name write this:

return require('Module:new name')

—Trappist the monk (talk) 13:54, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Hhkohh (talk) 15:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:User apc

Hi, I have a question regarding the page Category:User apc: why is it that under Pages in category "User apc", Template:User apc-3 and Template:User apc aren't visible? Thanks Nehme1499 (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

None of the templates except Template:User apc-0 are supposed to show there with the categories currently existing. The others are all gone after a null edit of them. For example, Template:User apc-1 adds Category:User apc-1 if that category exists, and otherwise adds Category:User apc. Category:User apc-1 exists now so only that category is added. When Template:User apc-1 was created, Category:User apc-1 did not exist yet so Category:User apc was added instead at the time. The software had not updated this after Category:User apc-1 was created. My null edit forced the update. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I see, thanks for helping me out. EDIT: I have another question: why is it that User apc isn't categorized in Wikipedians by language? Nehme1499 (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

It's there but it's sorted as "lib" under the L heading because the source of Category:User apc says [[Category:Wikipedians by language|lib]] where lib is a sort key. I don't know the difference between apc and lib so I cannot say whether this sorting is reasonable. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

OK I understand, thanks again! (apc is the official ISO 639-3 code for the Northern Levantine language group, most of which is made out of the Lebanese Arabic language: that's probably why apc and lib were used interchangeably) Nehme1499 (talk) 15:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

How do I center text in a content bar?

Hello, I have a question here about how to center text. On the article Political appointments by Donald Trump, I am trying to make a sub heading in the header cell and center it. I would appreciate it if someone would help me. Thanks, --Skim

@Skim127: It's not clear to me precisely what you want to do and the details are important. Please say exactly what you want to add and exactly where, or do as much of it as you can without damaging something, and then ask how to do the rest. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@PrimeHunter: What I am trying to do is, center text in a header cell when the text is a sub heading. Go to the article and look under one of the smaller offices that is a header cell. You will probably understand me better. --Skim

@Skim127: I'm not sure what you mean by sub heading and the tables I examined already have code to center text. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@PrimeHunter: What I mean is, when I put let's say the National Security Agency as sub-heading 2, it is distorted and goes to the bottom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skim127 (talk • contribs)

I still don't know what you are trying to do in which table or what you mean by sub-heading 2. Maybe somebody else can guess what you want. I give up. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:54, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@Skim127: Did you manage to do what you wanted? If not, copy the table, paste it in your sandbox (link located in the same line as your user name at the top of the page when you are logged on), do the changes you are trying to explain and post here the link to your sandbox so I can see the table, the changes, and we can continue the discussion here. Thinker78 (talk) 22:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

How to link correctly to disambiguation pages

I would appreciate it if someone would please review the most recent 3 or 4 edits in the edit history of the following two pages: Saint John and Saint John's. There was a link in the article (right at the top of the page, where it says "Not to be confused with"). The link was "incorrect". (It linked to a redirect, as opposed to linking directly to the correct page.) So, I changed it. Another editor reverted it. He states that even though it is linking to an "incorrect" page, that is the proper way that Wikipedia does such links. That makes no sense to me. So, I'd like some clarification, please. What is the correct way to do this? And, if my way is incorrect, why is that? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Hey Joseph, WP:INTDAB would explain better why such intentional redirects are made and how they primarily support report generation. That's one reason MOS:DABSEEALSO specifically advises this. Thanks, Lourdes 16:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@Lourdes: Ok. Thanks. So, that other editor (the one who reverted my edits) is correct in what he says? That "his way" is the correct way to do this in Wikipedia? Is that the case? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 20:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, "his way" is correct. The problem is that almost all links to DAB pages are accidental. We use a link to the redirected "(disambiguation)" page as a signal to other editors that we are deliberately linking to the DAB page and not accidentally attempting to link to one of its articles. There is an entire subculture of editors who spend their time fixing incorrect DAB links, and this scheme makes it easy to keep track of deliberate links and automatically remove them from automatically-generated lists of accidental links. -Arch dude (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

OK. Thanks. Yes, this does now somewhat make sense. A related question, then: To use this page as an example. Then, why not title this page "Saint John (disambiguation)" instead of simply "Saint John"? What's the reasoning behind that? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

We prefer simple page names when practical but there have been suggestions to also name it "X (disambiguation)" when there is no primary topic using the name "X". See e.g. Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 84#Uniform Disambiguation page naming. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, all. Very helpful. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I would like to thank Joseph A. Spadaro, Lourdes and Arch dude for this thread. I have learned from it. Maproom (talk) 08:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I need help with adding a reference on a wikipedia page

Can someone look for a reference online to add about Botswana getting transgender rights in 2017 on the 2017 in LGBT rights page? Sphinxmystery (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello Sphinx, the article LGBT rights in Botswana has some interesting references. You could add them yourself too. Warmly, Lourdes 16:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

What is the difference between the following pages?

Wikipedia:Good topics starts as follows:

A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though not all are featured articles).

And then Wikipedia:Featured topics starts as follows:

A featured topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though not necessarily featured articles).

I'm confused, what's the difference?--occono (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

You should look at criteria. Ruslik_Zero 20:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I still don't understand the difference after reading that. I would have presumed Featured topics only allows Featured articles, but the description doesn't state that. Can you point out exactly what the criteria difference is?--occono (talk) 00:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria says:

1. (a) With featured topics only:

   (i) At least one half (50%) of the items are featured class (featured articles or featured lists), with a minimum of two featured items.

   (ii) All other articles are good articles.

   (b) With good topics only:

   (i) All items are at least featured lists or good articles.

PrimeHunter (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I think part of the OP's point is that the introductions to those articles really need to be revised so they don't seem so identical. HiLo48 (talk) 01:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Merging Pacific Islands

Can you please consider notifying other people of the merger discussion right here? Nobody has objected within the last 4 months. --2601:183:101:58D0:3545:2E73:437A:CAC9 (talk) 17:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Convert URI/DOI to Valid DOI

How do I convert the URI/DOI http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52403 to a DOI? I've deduced that it the DOI is 10524/52403, and put it into the following, wrapped by a 'ref' tag.

{{Cite journal|last1=Owen|first1=R. Wyn|date=2017 |title=A description and linguistic analysis of the Tai Khuen writing system |url=https://evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10524/52403 |journal=Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society |volume=10.1 |pages=140-164 |doi=10524/52403 }}

The link generated from the DOI works, but I get the error message, "Check |doi= value (help)." -- RichardW57 (talk) 23:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I don't know if the hdl can be directly converted to a doi, but, you can use |hdl=:

{{Cite journal|last1=Owen|first1=R. Wyn|date=2017 |title=A description and linguistic analysis of the Tai Khuen writing system |url=https://evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10524/52403 |journal=Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society |volume=10.1 |pages=140-164 |hdl=10524/52403}}

Owen, R. Wyn (2017). "A description and linguistic analysis of the Tai Khuen writing system". Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. 10.1: 140–164. hdl:10524/52403.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 23:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

• Based only on the Digital object identifier article and the DOI documentation inside {{cite journal}}, it looks like the DOI is really 10.524/52403, that is, with a period after the first two digits. But I've never actually done this. -Arch dude (talk) 23:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
• so here: Owen, R. Wyn (2017). "A description and linguistic analysis of the Tai Khuen writing system". Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. 10.1: 140–164. doi:10.524/52403. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help) -Arch dude (talk) 23:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Well, that passes the edit check in cite journal, but it does not actually link to the DOI page :-( -Arch dude (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The Handle System and DOI numbers are not interchangeable. Multiple resolution is a feature of the Handle System technology, but it was not designed to scale above a few million handles, whereas a DOI can scale to any number of handles. That's why Handle numbers appear to be shorter than DOI's, containing only half the numbers and letters a DOI has.  spintendo  01:58, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The documentation at www.doi.org specifies that a DOI is a prefix, a slash, and a suffix. The prefix, it is alledged, always starts with the three characters "10." and can then have any characters (except a slash) These prefixes are assigned by the DOI organization to registered organizations or something. Those organizations then assign the suffixes to entities such as individual documents. If this documentation is correct, then "10524/52403" cannot be a valid DOI because "10524" cannot be a valid prefix, so the edit check that is part of {{cite journal}} is doig the right thing. However, if you type "10524/52403" into the box that says "enter a DOI" at that site, it just works, so the DOI site is doing something with it taht is not consistent with their own documentation. Under the circumstances I think out best move as documented above, is to treat it as a hdl instead of a DOI. -Arch dude (talk) 02:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

That is correct, it is not a valid DOI, it's a valid HDL number. As far as I can tell, JSEALS is not registered at all as a journal with a DOI prefix assigned to them, which is a prerequisite to having one of their articles receiving its own DOI. The publication itself has unique requirements for having items published, which apparently are all published as open access documents, which is rare as far as academic publications are concerned.  spintendo  02:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

June 25

How do I cite repeated references in talk pages?

There are duplicate references in a discussion in Noah's Ark talk page, in the section, "Myth vs account or story controversy". How are they supposed to be cited? In articles the ref is given a name but I think that doesn't work in talk pages unless, most likely, I did something wrong. Thinker78 (talk) 02:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

• Refs on talk pages should ordinarily be forced into the section of the page the has the ref. This is done by adding {{reflist talk}} to the end of a section if that section has refs. Within a section, then, you consolidate refs using names, just as you would within an article. -Arch dude (talk) 03:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Could you show me with the repeated ref of Pewforum? I tried to refname last time and I wasn't able to in the talk page. Thinker78 (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

• Sure. I edited the section for you. -Arch dude (talk) 04:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Help:please cite the work for me / God's Creation Equilibrium of Easter Celebration

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthonia Ezemonye (talk • contribs) 25 June 2018 10:03 (UTC)

@Anthonia Ezemonye: Please provide a link to a page where you are encountering difficulty. I cannot see an edit in your edit history to a related page. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Incorrect link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_John%27s_School,_Leatherhead#Notable_Old_Johnians

The link to the Old Johnians on here is incorrect (it links to the notable former pupils of a different school). The category link is correct. How do I remove the incorrect link without removing the whole section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SJS1851 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@SJS1851: Can you clarify please? The link to Old Johnians goes to List of people educated at St John's School, Leatherhead. Is there a problem with an individual entry (or multiple entries)? Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The names on that page are actually the former pupils of Hurstpierpoint College (the confusion seems to be because former pupils of both schools are called 'Old Johnians'). The sane list and information is correctly presented on their page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Johnians_(Hurstpierpoint_College)

The page has been incorrectly linked and attributed to St John's School, Leatherhead.

SJS1851 (talk) 13:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed I changed the link in the Leatherhead one to point directly to the correct article. Also created a disambiguation page at Old Johnians to cater for both using the same term but being different places. No doubt there will be other places that have Old Johnians too in the future. - X201 (talk) 14:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

• There still seems to remain, the problem of List of people educated at St John's School, Leatherhead which contains the apparently duplicated information. Shpuld this go to WP:AfD with a suitable explanation? Eagleash (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Question about autopatrolled

Hello. I was thinking of applying for autoparolled once I reach 25 articles, (Currently at 16.) However I have a question. Does it matter what the article is rated as? Like does it needed to be 25 good articles, or is 25 articles with zero problems but are rated Start-Class enough? Your help will be appreciated. Thank you. In Memoriam A.H.H.^{What, you egg?}.

@In Memoriam A.H.H.: It doesn't have to be WP:GA "good," just "no serious problems in the initial posting." Copyvios, BLP violations, and insufficient sourcing to prove notability would be serious problems. A few typos or non-page-breaking formatting issues that WP:GNOMEs will take care of don't/shouldn't count as "serious problems." It only makes sense for it to apply to initial postings instead of later revisions, otherwise autopatrolled would be identical to autoconfirmed.

Looking over the past several articles you cranked out in the past month, your initial postings mostly look like what would result from my usual advice on how to write articles (though my advice is overly strict on primary sources links to counter new users' tendency to cite only those if anything, but that doesn't seem to be a problem for you). I'm almost inclined to throw the autopatrolled right at you based on those. However:

• I am a little concerned about the Youtube links. I totally get their relevance and I'm assuming that 90 year old cartoons from collapsed animation studios are public domain but something at least on the talk page (if not a sourced line in the article) proving that there's no longer any copyright would prevent any potential disputes.
• While you have learned a lot since you first started, some of your earliest articles (such as LA Law: The Computer Game) were abandoned in an unsatisfactory state. Some of them (like Loadstar: The Legend of Tully Bodine) were improved to a "good enough" point -- but mostly thanks to other editors saving the article. You don't need to go back and fix those, I wouldn't count them against you, but I just wouldn't count them toward the number of satisfactory articles you've made (0 points rather than -1). Your drafts are generally in a similar state.

I'll leave your contributions page open in another tab (did anyone else just hear my browser scream?) and check in when I can. If I keep seeing improvement continued improvement in your initial postings, I don't see why we'd have to wait for the full 25. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

What knowledge is important?

Fenchol

In the fenchol page, is reported that some Aster species and Basil as plant containing the terpene in question.

I added the Cannabis plant, because in some selected sub-species, the scent of Basil is dominant and you can clearly recognize the "basil smell and taste". In the reference i added it was reported a sample were the quantity of the terpene was not dominant (enough to PROVE it is one of the many terpenes the plant produces), but simply one of the many compounds produced.

So is WRONG to add all the know plants that contains the terpene in the page itself? Should be limited to main components? How to act with human selected sub-species were some terpenes are indeed making up for the main "bouquet" and the terpene profile is very different from the mother specie?

My editing was ideologically wrong or what is the meter of measure here?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jekomac (talk • contribs) 16:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jekomac: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia just summarizes and cites professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources.

Now please assume good faith from other users. That's one of the foundational site policies. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

An element not having enough space?

I was going through articles in attempts to fix Lint errors. I came across Beautiful Mess (Kristian Kostov song) in the list, and it had the same problem I had seen with numerous other articles using "Infobox: single" - it had curly braces in the wrong position, causing the Eurovision entry to be inside it, resulting in a nested table (a high priority Lint error).

While I fixed this issue, it resulted in a side effect I don't know how to approach. The article contains an image in the Eurovision Song Content section of Kristian Kostov performing the song... however, ever since my change, this image hasn't been appearing the right location. The way it displays for me, this also results in one of the tables on the track listing being shoved behind the infoboxes.

My confusion only gets worse if I decide to look at the page via the migration tool - if I do so, the image is in yet another position (that's also incorrect).

Is there anything I can do to make space for the image, or force the image to remain in its assigned section? Wsan2 (talk) 18:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@Wsan2: The left-floating image can stay in place by using {{stack begin}} and {{stack end}} around consecutive right-floating elements.[3] But you are not using the best method to fix the lint error in this case. I used Template:Infobox song contest entry#Embedding instead.[4] PrimeHunter (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

PHOTO POSTED ON REGINALD LeBORG WEB PAGE

The photo currently posted is not LeBorg, it is Forrest Ackerman. This photo should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Regihom (talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

June 26

Television interviews posted to youtube

Is it OK to use a television interview posted to youtube as a footnote if the call letters of the station and/or the show appear on the screen?

please help me

please tell me in detail what i have to edit in my article. Actually i want to create a page or article for my website roxstarindia. Please guide me in detail what i have to add and what i have to edit. And also tell me what reference i have to add in it, but i don't have any reference so please tell me the list of reference which i can add in the article. My Article is Draft:roxstarindia