Template talk:Conwy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Kapohogrrl (talk | contribs) |
→Rivers: new section |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:There should be no duplication between principal settlements and towns and villages within a template. Is there a standard designation within each principal area of Wales that denotes the largest population...is it principal settlement? I am no authority given my geographic distance (*cough* I'm an American!) so please correct the groups within each template as necessary. If you look at the talk page of {{tl|Ceredigion}} you will see the discussion that lead me to the template design. It is based on the UK example. I am depending upon the expertise of "the locals" to help with this project and process. Then what to do about [[User:Geaugagrrl/additions#Templates|Cardiff and Swansea]]? Thanks. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> ~[[User:Geaugagrrl|<span style="color:#9955BB;">Geaugagrrl</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geaugagrrl|<span style="color:#bfb1a3;"> talk</span>]]</sup></span> 12:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
:There should be no duplication between principal settlements and towns and villages within a template. Is there a standard designation within each principal area of Wales that denotes the largest population...is it principal settlement? I am no authority given my geographic distance (*cough* I'm an American!) so please correct the groups within each template as necessary. If you look at the talk page of {{tl|Ceredigion}} you will see the discussion that lead me to the template design. It is based on the UK example. I am depending upon the expertise of "the locals" to help with this project and process. Then what to do about [[User:Geaugagrrl/additions#Templates|Cardiff and Swansea]]? Thanks. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> ~[[User:Geaugagrrl|<span style="color:#9955BB;">Geaugagrrl</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geaugagrrl|<span style="color:#bfb1a3;"> talk</span>]]</sup></span> 12:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Rivers == |
|||
The Rivers section currently lists six rivers as "River X", and a further 8 as "Afon X". Some consistency would be nice. |
|||
Rather than choosing either the Welsh or English prefix, another option may be to forgo the prefix altogether, as the sidebar indicates that they are all rivers. [[User:Ansbaradigeidfran|Ansbaradigeidfran]] ([[User talk:Ansbaradigeidfran|talk]]) 15:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:06, 28 June 2018
 | Wales Template‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Principal settlements < > towns & villages
All of the places listed under "Principal Settlements" are then duplicated under "Towns & Villages", which I'm not sure is necessary. On the Gwynedd Template, for instance, the 2 PSs are not then re-listed under T&Vs. There are quite a lot of PSs listed in Conwy - maybe an answerr would be to rename "Towns & Villages" as "Other Towns & Villages", then remove the duplicates. What do people think? Hogyn Lleol (talk) 07:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- There should be no duplication between principal settlements and towns and villages within a template. Is there a standard designation within each principal area of Wales that denotes the largest population...is it principal settlement? I am no authority given my geographic distance (*cough* I'm an American!) so please correct the groups within each template as necessary. If you look at the talk page of {{Ceredigion}} you will see the discussion that lead me to the template design. It is based on the UK example. I am depending upon the expertise of "the locals" to help with this project and process. Then what to do about Cardiff and Swansea? Thanks. ~Geaugagrrl talk 12:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Rivers
The Rivers section currently lists six rivers as "River X", and a further 8 as "Afon X". Some consistency would be nice.
Rather than choosing either the Welsh or English prefix, another option may be to forgo the prefix altogether, as the sidebar indicates that they are all rivers. Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)