User talk:Kleuske: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:52, 30 June 2018

Welcome to my talk page.

New messages at the bottom of the page, please. Messages placed elsewhere will be ignored and/or removed.

External Video

AFAIK the External Video format neatly sidesteps the WP:ELNO objection. Correct me if I'm wrong! kencf0618 (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kencf0618: "Sidestepping" is not what Wikipedia is about. And no I don't agree, since it's "about the new book of the author" instead of Hegel. Kleuske (talk) 06:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the External Video format is a distinction without a difference, but be that as it may, what new book are you talking about? Dr. Gary B. Sadler is discussing Hegel, not touting his own books. He hasn't published any to date. kencf0618 (talk) 23:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Material

Hi, Would it be possible to receive the material from the deleted page Bear(Productivity App) so I can edit the conflicting material please?n thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damienkelly26 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Damienkelly26: See WP:REFUND. Kleuske (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Cars

Kleuske, you deleted my updates in the Wiki page on solar prototypes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prototype_solar-powered_cars But, pls, consider that in this way you re-introduced several inconsistencies. 1. the P-MOB, the FIAT prototype, does not exist in the reality. I even tried to contact the project manager, who was fired 3 year ago. Now, you re-introduced the flake information that the homologation is under consideration. Everyone moving in this field knows that FIAT group rejects any idea of solar mobility or electrical car. 2. you deleted my information regarding the italian situation and, in particular, OndaSolare (Bologna) and Futuro Solare (Sicily) teams, with our 5 cars, including our cars ('Emilia 3') that won 2 competitions and arrive 3 in Belgium. And we are the only EU team at the ASC. 3. in my opinion the technical table about Twente has to be moved away. For instance you can create a specific page. At the moment, it is not in the right position. In this page it is simply requested the list of cars and not all their details. When I noticed that I simply imagined that someone from Twente made a mistake. Anyway, if you really like it, at least, report the technical data of a new model. cheers Cristiano — Preceding unsigned comment added by CiranoTheBest (talk • contribs) 17:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CiranoTheBest: A little explanation (in the edit summary) goes a long way. The additions are still unsourced. The talk-page of the article is the appropriate venue to raise issues. Kleuske (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kleuske: You are totally right: data in 'Specifications' are unsourced. Reference dealing with P-MOB homologation was not existing. As said, you can delete both. :-)

राजनीति का सार

Hi Kleuske, you just tagged this as CSD (totally agree), however the link to a foreign wikipedia article does not make sense. Probably a copy/past error. This may be rudimenary dupe of Computational thinking if I trust google translate. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 14:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got "politics" from the same source. Never mind. I'm not going to start WW-III over this. Kleuske (talk) 14:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Octocat is a youtube chennel please don't delete it

Please Qwerty 12345688999 (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a completely and utterly non-notable, run-of-the-mill YT-channel. Please do not add it again. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 14:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry for starting an editing war Qwerty 12345688999 (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baja Designs

Please let me know which parts of my draft were too promotioney so that I can edit the post to fit the Wikipedia guidelines better. Thanks. Redolive1 (talk) 17:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)User:RedOlive1 (talk) 11:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Down and COI

Hi Kleuske, I think this is the first time we have spoke. How are you? What did you add my name back into WP:COI noticeboard, when I was added by the filing editor who is clearly vindictive, probably paid, the evidence from their edit clearly shows and is not showing Good Faith. scope_creep (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: If that's true, then a WP:BOOMERANG will likely fly. Until that time, leave other peoples reports alone and have a little faith in the admins handling it. Kleuske (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your warning

Please see MOS:NC-CN which can justify my edit where I replace People's Republic of China with China (basically the same thing in English). Thanks!

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 Hi Kleuske, I think this is the first time we have spoke. How are you? What did you add my name back into [[WP:COI]] noticeboard, when I was added by the filing editor who is clearly vindictive, probably paid, the evidence from their edit clearly shows and is not showing Good Faith. [[User:Scope creep|scope_creep]] ([[User talk:Scope creep|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 :{{re|Scope creep}} If that's true, then a [[WP:BOOMERANG]] will likely fly. Until that time, leave other peoples reports alone and have a little faith in the admins handling it. [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]] ([[User talk:Kleuske#top|talk]]) 17:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
+== Regarding your warning ==
+Please see [[MOS:NC-CN]] which can justify my edit where I replace People's Republic of China with China (basically the same thing in English). Thanks!