User talk:71.63.254.94: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:50, 13 July 2018

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, c-71-63-254-94.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (71.63.254.94), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Comcast Cable. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register).

Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

November 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to GMC Acadia— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 23:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Ford Expedition, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 23:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm L3X1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paul Frees have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. L3X1 (distant write) 04:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to KARR (Knight Rider). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Michael Richardson. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Ford Expedition

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ford Expedition, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm NottNott. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Social nudity in San Francisco— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -NottNott|talk 02:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nerd seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nerd. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chocolate box art. Just Chilling (talk) 12:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Rat rod

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Rat rod article that is against the Manual of style, so I have reverted it. In the future, please make sure your contributions follow this. Thank you! RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions)

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for persistently adding [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|unsourced or poorly sourced content]].  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 05:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ucblock -->
+==Recent edit to Rat rod==
+[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the [[Rat rod]] article that is against the [[WP:MOS|Manual of style]], so I have reverted it. In the future, please make sure your contributions follow this. Thank you! [[User:RandNetter96|RandNetter96]] ([[User talk:RandNetter96|Talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/RandNetter96|Contributions]])